The Judgment of the Nations: Structural Sin, Social Ontology, and Social Eschatology
Can social groups, as social groups, sin? Can they be judged? There is an ambivalence in late 20th-century Catholicism in this regard, between a form of personalism on the one hand, in which only individuals are persons and hence moral subjects, and traditional Thomists along with revisionary libera...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
2024
|
| In: |
Irish theological quarterly
Year: 2024, Volume: 89, Issue: 3, Pages: 231-244 |
| Further subjects: | B
social sin
B Liberation Theology B structural sin B social ontology B Personalism B Eschatology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 189764163X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240804055506.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240804s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00211400241248840 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)189764163X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP189764163X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McCullough, Ross |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Judgment of the Nations: Structural Sin, Social Ontology, and Social Eschatology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Can social groups, as social groups, sin? Can they be judged? There is an ambivalence in late 20th-century Catholicism in this regard, between a form of personalism on the one hand, in which only individuals are persons and hence moral subjects, and traditional Thomists along with revisionary liberation theologians on the other. This paper argues that we can accommodate the worries of the first group with the more robust social ontology implied by the second. This social ontology can be found both in the work of contemporary analytic philosophers and, inchoately at least, in traditional Aristotelianism, and it allows us to give a more precise account of the metaphysics of structural sin than the alternatives. The paper concludes by suggesting that there is a way in which social groups, as social groups, might face judgment and then persist eschatologically. | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Eschatologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a structural sin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social sin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a social ontology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Personalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberation Theology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Eschatology | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Irish theological quarterly |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1951 |g 89(2024), 3, Seite 231-244 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)376275782 |w (DE-600)2130458-0 |w (DE-576)265831903 |x 1752-4989 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:89 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g pages:231-244 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400241248840 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4562518499 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 189764163X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240804055506 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240804||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-08-03#258614BF04DFC9087CF912AA80145E05F9F7FE7E | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||