"Be Anxious for Nothing": Anselm on Fearing Evil

According to the privation theory of evil, evil is nothing. In De casu diaboli Anselm’s student-interlocutor raises three arguments meant to show that evil is in fact something: the argument from fear (if evil is nothing, there can be no reason to fear it), the argument from signification (if evil i...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Anselm
Main Author: Williams, Thomas 1967- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2024
In: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2024, Volume: 98, Issue: 2, Pages: 215-225
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1896673414
003 DE-627
005 20240726155658.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240726s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/acpq2024531291  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1896673414 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1896673414 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)172465036  |0 (DE-627)697403858  |0 (DE-576)133326691  |4 aut  |a Williams, Thomas  |d 1967- 
109 |a Williams, Thomas 1967- 
245 1 0 |a "Be Anxious for Nothing": Anselm on Fearing Evil 
246 1 |i Themenheft  |a Anselm 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a According to the privation theory of evil, evil is nothing. In De casu diaboli Anselm’s student-interlocutor raises three arguments meant to show that evil is in fact something: the argument from fear (if evil is nothing, there can be no reason to fear it), the argument from signification (if evil is nothing, "evil" has no signification; if "evil" has a signification, evil is not nothing), and the argument from causal efficacy (if evil is nothing, how can it enslave the soul to passion and cause it so much trouble?). I expound the account of language that Anselm uses to answer the argument from signification and the distinctions between justice and advantage and between positive and privative evils that he uses to answer the arguments from fear and from causal efficacy. I conclude that, by the time Anselm gets done with it, there is not much left of the privation theory. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American catholic philosophical quarterly  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990  |g 98(2024), 2, Seite 215-225  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372353592  |w (DE-600)2122401-8  |w (DE-576)47637314X  |x 2153-8441  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:98  |g year:2024  |g number:2  |g pages:215-225 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2024531291  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpq&id=acpq_2024_0098_0002_0215_0225  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4557378773 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1896673414 
LOK |0 005 20240726155222 
LOK |0 008 240726||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw