Thomas Aquinas on Concrete Particulars

There are two competing models for how to understand Aquinas’s hylomorphic theory of material substances: the Simple Model, according to which material substances are composed of prime matter and substantial form, and the Expanded Model, according to which material substances are composed of prime m...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skrzypek, Jeremy W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2024
In: American catholic philosophical quarterly
Year: 2024, Volume: 98, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-72
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1896673252
003 DE-627
005 20240726155427.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240726s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5840/acpq2024515288  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1896673252 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1896673252 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Skrzypek, Jeremy W.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Thomas Aquinas on Concrete Particulars 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There are two competing models for how to understand Aquinas’s hylomorphic theory of material substances: the Simple Model, according to which material substances are composed of prime matter and substantial form, and the Expanded Model, according to which material substances are composed of prime matter, substantial form, and all of their accidental forms. In this paper, I first explain the main differences between these two models and show how they situate Aquinas’s theory of material substances in two different places within the contemporary debate on concrete particulars, highlighting several advantages that Aquinas’s approach has over other varieties of substratum and bundle theory along the way. I then offer some reasons to think that the Expanded Model, as a theory of concrete particulars, is preferable. I argue that the Expanded Model avoids two major concerns for the Simple Model: the problem of extrinsicality, and the problem of too-many-possessors. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American catholic philosophical quarterly  |d Charlottesville, Va. : Philosophy Documentation Center, 1990  |g 98(2024), 1, Seite 49-72  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)372353592  |w (DE-600)2122401-8  |w (DE-576)47637314X  |x 2153-8441  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:98  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:49-72 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq2024515288  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=acpq&id=acpq_2024_0098_0001_0049_0072  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4557378609 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1896673252 
LOK |0 005 20240726155213 
LOK |0 008 240726||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw