Twenty-five years on: to move forward, we should return to Rawls’ The Law of Peoples
In The Law of Peoples, John Rawls sets out his normative conception of global justice. The book remains a foundational text for scholars in the field. In recent years, however, new issues have arisen in the global justice literature, which Rawls did not consider. Moreover, his view has been rejected...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
2024
|
| In: |
Journal of global ethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 91–98 |
| Further subjects: | B
John Rawls
B Global Justice B The Law of Peoples B Liberalism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1896514359 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240726055506.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240726s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/17449626.2024.2346649 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1896514359 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1896514359 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Vergara, Ezekiel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Twenty-five years on: to move forward, we should return to Rawls’ The Law of Peoples |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In The Law of Peoples, John Rawls sets out his normative conception of global justice. The book remains a foundational text for scholars in the field. In recent years, however, new issues have arisen in the global justice literature, which Rawls did not consider. Moreover, his view has been rejected by many. So, as we move forward, does Rawls’ The Law of Peoples deserve to retain this foundational status? I argue that we have two weighty reasons to afford it this status. As we consider the future directions of global justice, we should do so by returning to The Law of Peoples. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Liberalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Global Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a The Law of Peoples | |
| 650 | 4 | |a John Rawls | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of global ethics |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 |g 20(2024), 1, Seite 91–98 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)506719197 |w (DE-600)2219472-1 |w (DE-576)378913263 |x 1744-9634 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:91–98 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2024.2346649 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4557259561 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1896514359 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240726055506 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240726||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-07-25#C409E1AF92BA812D394CBB64F5705889C4B9ABD5 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||