God as both Hierarchical and Egalitarian: A Kierkegaardian Proposal Based on Philosophical Fragments
Video Abstract After highlighting Søren Kierkegaard's emphasis on the absolute difference between God and humans, this article presents his explanation of why we can readily embrace our inferior position to God, which appeals to his understanding of love as involving the desire to be the guilty...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
School
2024
|
| In: |
Toronto journal of theology
Year: 2024, Volume: 40, Issue: 1, Pages: 63-73 |
| Further subjects: | B
Irenaean theodicy
B Marilyn Adams B Christology B Kierkegaard B Love B problem of evil B Kenosis |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1892158302 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240625110747.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240625s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3138/tjt-2024-0013 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1892158302 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1892158302 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Woo, Jaeha |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a God as both Hierarchical and Egalitarian |b A Kierkegaardian Proposal Based on Philosophical Fragments |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Video Abstract After highlighting Søren Kierkegaard's emphasis on the absolute difference between God and humans, this article presents his explanation of why we can readily embrace our inferior position to God, which appeals to his understanding of love as involving the desire to be the guilty party. But this argument can be turned around to make a case that God would desire to be the guilty party in relation to us. This fits well with the story of God's love in Kierkegaard's pseudonymous writing Philosophical Fragments, in which divine incarnation is interpreted as God's descent in history to establish equality with humans. After arguing that such a kenotic Christology is not incompatible with the absolute God-human difference because it accentuates the fact that only God can cross the divide, the author points out its similarity with Marilyn Adams’ view that God became the curse in Jesus to cancel out the power of the curse of sin. He finishes by dealing with the worry that, despite divine descent, some humans may be unable to stand boldly confident before God because of their memory of what their sinfulness has caused. One way to alleviate this worry is to adopt the Irenaean affirmation of God's ultimate responsibility, and the author claims that this would complete Kierkegaard's Philosophical Fragments by adding an interpretation of the crucifixion in line with its story of divine descent. | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Fragment | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Christology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Irenaean theodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Marilyn Adams | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kenosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Love | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Toronto journal of theology |d Toronto, Ontario : School, 2004 |g 40(2024), 1, Seite 63-73 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618790020 |w (DE-600)2537907-0 |w (DE-576)398101299 |x 1918-6371 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:63-73 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt-2024-0013 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/tjt-2024-0013 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4541574047 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1892158302 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240625110747 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240625||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Kenosis,Kenosis |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Kénose,Kénose |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Quenosis,Quenosis |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Kenosi <motivo>,Kenosi,Chenosi,Chenosi,Chenosi (motivo),Chenosi |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 虚己说,虚己说,虚己论,虚己论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 虛己說,虛己說,虛己論,虛己論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Quenosis,Quenosis |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Кенозис (мотив),Кенозис |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Κένωση (μοτίβο),Κένωση |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Kenose,Selbstentäußerung Christi,Kenosis-Christologie,Kenotische Christologie |