Rethinking Anonymous Grading
It has become increasingly common to endorse and implement anonymous grading as a way of promoting fairness or equality of opportunity in the classroom. The American Philosophical Association currently recommends anonymous grading, as do the Canadian Philosophical Association, the British Philosophi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2024
|
| In: |
Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2024, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 237-251 |
| Further subjects: | B
Ethics
B Higher Education B Grading B philosophy of education |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1892103540 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240826222455.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240624s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10677-023-10415-y |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1892103540 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1892103540 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Southgate, Libby |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0001-5074-6482 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rethinking Anonymous Grading |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a It has become increasingly common to endorse and implement anonymous grading as a way of promoting fairness or equality of opportunity in the classroom. The American Philosophical Association currently recommends anonymous grading, as do the Canadian Philosophical Association, the British Philosophical Association, the Society for Women in Philosophy, and Minorities and Philosophy. Despite its increasing prevalence, the practice has received surprisingly little attention in applied ethics. This paper begins filling this gap. I start by clarifying the "Standard Argument" from fairness or equality of opportunity for anonymous grading. I then argue that the Standard Argument fails to support current models for anonymous grading. The issue: current models for anonymous grading are practically self-undermining if the aim is to reduce violations of equality of opportunity or fairness. So, if we want to address bias in grading because we care about equality of opportunity or fairness, we need to change how we do it. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Grading | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Higher Education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of education | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical theory and moral practice |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998 |g 27(2024), 2, Seite 237-251 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320527093 |w (DE-600)2015306-5 |w (DE-576)104558555 |x 1572-8447 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:237-251 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10415-y |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4541423782 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1892103540 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240624145319 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240624||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||