Gappying Curry Redux
In "Currying omnipotence: A reply to Beall and Cotnoir", Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia argue that Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir's gappy solution to the traditional paradox of unrestricted omnipotence does not extend to a Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2024
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2024, Volume: 63, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-11 |
| Further subjects: | B
Gappy logic
B Curry paradox B Paradox of omnipotence B Unrestricted omnipotence |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | In "Currying omnipotence: A reply to Beall and Cotnoir", Andrew Tedder and Guillermo Badia argue that Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir's gappy solution to the traditional paradox of unrestricted omnipotence does not extend to a Curry-like version of the paradox. In this paper, we show that it does extend to it. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-023-00967-y |