Minors Lack the Autonomy to Consent to Gender-Affirming Care: Best Interests Must Be Primary
What ethically justifies the provision of invasive and irreversible treatments to minors? In this commentary, I examine this question in response to Moti Gorin's article “What Is the Aim of Pediatric ‘Gender-Affirming’ Care?,” which critiques autonomy-based arguments for justification of gender...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley
2024
|
In: |
The Hastings Center report
Year: 2024, Volume: 54, Issue: 3, Pages: 57-58 |
Further subjects: | B
best interests of the child
B gender-affirming care B pediatric decision-making B Bioethics B GAC B gender dysphoria B Autonomy B clinical ethics |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |