‘Obligatory Relegation’, ‘Willing Translation’, or ‘Unreserved Declaration’? The Place of Religious Ideas in Public Square Deliberation

This paper describes three basic positions that have been held in relation to the place of religious ideas and reasons in public square deliberation by outlining the arguments of major representatives of each position. The three positions are: ‘obligatory relegation’ (Robert Audi); ‘willing translat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fong, Edmung (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2024
In: International journal of public theology
Year: 2024, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 246-265
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
NCD Political ethics
VA Philosophy
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B secular reason
B Taylor
B public reason
B Wolterstorff
B Audi
B Habermas
B Rawls
B public square deliberation
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1890306266
003 DE-627
005 20240624215510.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240530s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15697320-20241576  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1890306266 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1890306266 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fong, Edmung  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a ‘Obligatory Relegation’, ‘Willing Translation’, or ‘Unreserved Declaration’? The Place of Religious Ideas in Public Square Deliberation 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper describes three basic positions that have been held in relation to the place of religious ideas and reasons in public square deliberation by outlining the arguments of major representatives of each position. The three positions are: ‘obligatory relegation’ (Robert Audi); ‘willing translation’ (John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas), and ‘unreserved declaration’ (Nicholas Wolterstorff and Charles Taylor). I conclude by offering an observation from the survey. Even as the question of the place of religious ideas in public square deliberation can be approached from either broader domains of the secularisation/post-secularisation of societies or the essence of liberal democracy, it is not the domain itself but rather specific conceptions of key ideas or notions within each domain that push the representatives to take the position that they do. 
601 |a Translation 
650 4 |a Taylor 
650 4 |a Wolterstorff 
650 4 |a Rawls 
650 4 |a Habermas 
650 4 |a Audi 
650 4 |a public square deliberation 
650 4 |a secular reason 
650 4 |a public reason 
652 |a KAJ:NCD:VA:ZC 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of public theology  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 2007  |g 18(2024), 2, Seite 246-265  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)556726774  |w (DE-600)2403647-X  |w (DE-576)306835614  |x 1569-7320  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2024  |g number:2  |g pages:246-265 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20241576  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/ijpt/18/2/article-p246_7.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4531692284 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1890306266 
LOK |0 005 20240624215510 
LOK |0 008 240530||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-29#F6AC69574B28ADC7EBDDD337BCB52B966D346607 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052856  |a NCD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL