Is Bellarmine’s “Fourth Proposition” Identical with the “Extreme View” of Albert Pighius?
Christian Washburn has questioned my claim that the idea of a publicly heretical pope was formally excluded in Pastor Aeternus, by equating Bellarmine’s “fourth proposition” with the extreme Ultramontanist school of Albert Pighius. Washburn argues that Gasser had merely indicated that Bellarmine’s “...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2024
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 85, Issue: 2, Pages: 317-323 |
| Further subjects: | B
Juan de Torquemada
B Robert Bellarmine B Guido Terreni B Johann Baptist Franzelin B infallible security B heretical pope B Gallicanism B Vatican I B Ultramontanism B Albert Pighius |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 189018232X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240529055505.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240529s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00405639241257841 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)189018232X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP189018232X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a O’Regan, Emmett |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Bellarmine’s “Fourth Proposition” Identical with the “Extreme View” of Albert Pighius? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Christian Washburn has questioned my claim that the idea of a publicly heretical pope was formally excluded in Pastor Aeternus, by equating Bellarmine’s “fourth proposition” with the extreme Ultramontanist school of Albert Pighius. Washburn argues that Gasser had merely indicated that Bellarmine’s “fourth opinion” would be raised to dogmatic status, rather than the “fourth proposition.” I attempt to address this critique by demonstrating how Bellarmine’s own school of thought within the “fourth opinion” was markedly different from that of Pighius. | ||
| 601 | |a Proposition | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Vatican I | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ultramontanism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Juan de Torquemada | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Guido Terreni | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Albert Pighius | |
| 650 | 4 | |a infallible security | |
| 650 | 4 | |a heretical pope | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gallicanism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Johann Baptist Franzelin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Robert Bellarmine | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theological studies |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage Publ., 1940 |g 85(2024), 2, Seite 317-323 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341343889 |w (DE-600)2067096-5 |w (DE-576)266225179 |x 2169-1304 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:317-323 |
| 856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00405639241257841 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00405639241257841 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4531215699 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 189018232X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240529055505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240529||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-28#B1812F8368F96AD609824557CB28AB3C40EBF1A0 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota |a tiep | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||