An ‘Amateur of Genius’: C.s. Lewis on the Risks of Professional Theology

Abstract: Six decades after his death, there is still no scholarly consensus regarding whether C.S. Lewis should be considered an important theologian of the twentieth century. This paper investigates where the belief that Lewis was not a theological writer worth taking seriously originated. Then it...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Perez, Jahdiel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2024
In: Heythrop journal
Year: 2024, Volume: 65, Issue: 3, Pages: 225-238
IxTheo Classification:CF Christianity and Science
FA Theology
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1889834572
003 DE-627
005 20240724102853.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240525s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/heyj.14306  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1889834572 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1889834572 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Perez, Jahdiel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a An ‘Amateur of Genius’: C.s. Lewis on the Risks of Professional Theology 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Abstract: Six decades after his death, there is still no scholarly consensus regarding whether C.S. Lewis should be considered an important theologian of the twentieth century. This paper investigates where the belief that Lewis was not a theological writer worth taking seriously originated. Then it evaluates two approaches that have been introduced in recent scholarship, by P.H. Brazier and Alister McGrath, that seek to affirm Lewis as a modern theologian of distinction. The final and central part of this paper nuances McGrath's argument by surveying seven reasons Lewis had for not doing theology the way academics did – reasons that have often been overlooked in the relevant literature. I argue that Lewis's decision to remain ‘outside the inner ring’ of academic theologians was based on a set of risks he perceived were involved in doing theology professionally. In so doing, I suggest that Lewis's writings about religious topics deserve to be taken seriously by professional theologians and other readers. Besides Lewis scholarship in particular, this discussion matters for Christian theology in general because it explores what it means to be a theologian in an era of professionalisation and the conditions under which religious writers like Lewis can become theologians, both of which cast light on how we understand the nature of theology. 
601 |a Theologe 
652 |a CF:FA:KAJ 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Heythrop journal  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1960  |g 65(2024), 3, Seite 225-238  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320573052  |w (DE-600)2016721-0  |w (DE-576)094425485  |x 1468-2265  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2024  |g number:3  |g pages:225-238 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.14306  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/heyj.14306  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4529387755 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1889834572 
LOK |0 005 20240812090436 
LOK |0 008 240525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-24#8E980065B86A165A9E1B60E3D93F3DD116B9AFD0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044020  |a FA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw