Distinguishing Normative Reasons in Logins' Erotetic Theory
We examine Logins’ erotetic view of normative reasons, specifically focusing on his distinction between normative reasoning reasons and normative explanatory reasons. A normative reasoning reason forms the content of a premise in reasoning or argument, while an explanatory reason is unsuitable for s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2023
|
| In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2023, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, Pages: 251-267 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1889833991 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240525055504.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240525s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2143/EP.30.3.3292838 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1889833991 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1889833991 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rotkale, Līva |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Distinguishing Normative Reasons in Logins' Erotetic Theory |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a We examine Logins’ erotetic view of normative reasons, specifically focusing on his distinction between normative reasoning reasons and normative explanatory reasons. A normative reasoning reason forms the content of a premise in reasoning or argument, while an explanatory reason is unsuitable for such a role. Logins considers this distinction to be robust and irreducible. Logins attempts to establish the distinction by appealing to specific examples where the roles diverge. We argue that these examples can be reinterpreted in a way that allows the same facts or propositions to fulfil both reasoning and explanatory roles. Furthermore, we contend that a case where a consideration is supposedly fit only for the explanatory role does not necessarily constitute a good explanation. Consequently, Logins’ strategy for establishing a ‘robust’ distinction between reasons may not be effective. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ethical perspectives |d Leuven : Peeters, 1994 |g 30(2023), 3, Seite 251-267 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)389126381 |w (DE-600)2148229-9 |w (DE-576)112891179 |x 1783-1431 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:251-267 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.30.3.3292838 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=3292838 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4529387178 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1889833991 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240525055504 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240525||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-24#7FD23403711C707CDC4F0CC7C15D01544E9C0E0A | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||