Losing the Forest for the Tree: Why All Thomists Should (Not) Be River Forest Thomists
One of the most influential and controversial schools of 20th century Thomism—especially in North America—is the “River Forest School” or “River Forest Thomism”. And one of the most influential and controversial theses associated with that school is the thesis that metaphysics cannot be established...
| Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
|---|---|
| Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
| Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
| Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Φόρτωση...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Έκδοση: |
MDPI
2024
|
| Στο/Στη: |
Religions
Έτος: 2024, Τόμος: 15, Τεύχος: 5 |
| Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
natural philosophy
B River Forest Thomism B Thomism B philosophy of science B Aquinas B Science B Metaphysics |
| Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1887630821 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240503055509.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240503s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel15050569 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1887630821 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1887630821 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Reese, Philip-Neri |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Losing the Forest for the Tree: Why All Thomists Should (Not) Be River Forest Thomists |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a One of the most influential and controversial schools of 20th century Thomism—especially in North America—is the “River Forest School” or “River Forest Thomism”. And one of the most influential and controversial theses associated with that school is the thesis that metaphysics cannot be established as a distinct and autonomous science unless one has already proven the existence of a positively immaterial being. The purpose of this paper is to show that River Forest Thomism cannot and should not be reduced to that controversial thesis. As such, rejection of the thesis cannot and should not constitute a rejection of the school. Indeed, as soon as we understand what River Forest Thomism was really about, it will become clear that all Thomists should be River Forest Thomists. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Aquinas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaphysics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a natural philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a River Forest Thomism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Thomism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Science | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 15(2024), 5, Artikel-ID 569 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g elocationid:569 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/569/pdf?version=1714468679 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15050569 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/569 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a NOMM | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4519999138 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1887630821 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240503055509 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240503||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-05-02#93C48ED8BF6143482454B694E6CF52A90F30ABE1 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||