Wittgenstein, Language, and the Trinity
Theistic religions differ in their conceptions of the nature of God. One philosophical-theological position, the Christian Trinity, stands out as unique amongst theistic religions. If such a position were demonstrated, it would significantly narrow the philosophical-theological gap in discussions of...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Université Catholique de Louvain
2024
|
| Dans: |
TheoLogica
Année: 2024, Volume: 8, Numéro: 1, Pages: 1-22 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Theism
B Language B Trinity B Polytheism B God B Wittgenstein |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | Theistic religions differ in their conceptions of the nature of God. One philosophical-theological position, the Christian Trinity, stands out as unique amongst theistic religions. If such a position were demonstrated, it would significantly narrow the philosophical-theological gap in discussions of God’s nature. I proposed that such an argument in favor of the Christian Trinity can be found in Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language. It is argued that language is an essentially social phenomenon and that God is a language user requiring God to be an essentially social being. As a result, either polytheism or the Christian Trinity is true. I argue that this divine social nature is best explained by the Christian Trinity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2593-0265 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: TheoLogica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.14428/thl.v8i1.74063 |