Casting Justice Before Swine: Late Mediaeval Pig Trials as Instances of Human Exceptionalism
In recent years, several cases about the legal personhood of nonhuman animals garnered global attention, e.g. the recognition of "basic rights" for the Argentinian great apes Sandra and Cecilia. Legal scholars have embraced the animal turn, blurring the once sovereign boundaries between pe...
| Subtitles: | "Special Issue on The Idea of Human Distinctiveness: Unavoidable or Untenable?" (Seite 613-738) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
2023
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 2023, Volume: 62, Issue: 4, Pages: 631-663 |
| Further subjects: | B
Critical animal studies
B Philosophy of law B History of ideas B Posthumanism B Philosophical Anthropology B History of Christian thought |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | In recent years, several cases about the legal personhood of nonhuman animals garnered global attention, e.g. the recognition of "basic rights" for the Argentinian great apes Sandra and Cecilia. Legal scholars have embraced the animal turn, blurring the once sovereign boundaries between persons and objects, recognising nonhuman beings as legal subjects. The zoonotic origins of the Covid-19 pandemic stress the urgency of establishing "global animal law" and deconstructing anthropocentrism. To this end, it is vital to also consider the extensive premodern legal history that humans share with other animals. Over 200 so-called animal trials have been documented in premodern Europe. In these proceedings, certain nonhuman animals - particularly domestic pigs - were prosecuted, often resulting in their capital punishment or anathema. This paper takes a history of ideas approach to these historical instances where Western philosophy of law and philosophical anthropology intersect, problematising the notion that such trials constitute wholesome precedents of the kind of legal personhood presently debated in jurisprudence. My counter-hegemonic analysis of the legal prosecution and execution of several pigs in fifteenth-century France demonstrates that late mediaeval notions of criminality transcended the alleged human-nonhuman divide whilst reaffirming and reifying human distinctiveness. I propose that pig trials were local laboratories where Christian communities reflected upon the natural hierarchy of God’s creation. Ensuing the apparent breach of the prescribed boundaries of nature, these communities renegotiated and re-naturalised everyday interspecies sociability by utilising the offending animals to exemplify particular norms about what it means to be human, generally to the animals' detriment. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/s11841-023-00970-3 |