Teologi som sträng vetenskap?
This article is written as a response to Mårten Björk's "Akademisk teologi som universell kunskapsform" in Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift 98 (2022). The article begins with an attempt to identify and describe what the author finds to be a unique quality of Björk's text as well as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Swedish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Bloms Boktryckeri
2024
|
| In: |
Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
Year: 2024, Volume: 100, Issue: 1, Pages: 13-23 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Theology
/ Science of Religion
/ Human sciences
/ Science
/ Method
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion CF Christianity and Science FA Theology |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This article is written as a response to Mårten Björk's "Akademisk teologi som universell kunskapsform" in Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift 98 (2022). The article begins with an attempt to identify and describe what the author finds to be a unique quality of Björk's text as well as the deeper intentions of his argument. As a next step, it discusses the consequences of Björk's theological position, critically and constructively. The interpretation centres around questions regarding scientific methods, dominant notions of knowledge, and infrastructural aspects of the contemporary research milieu within the humanities. |
|---|---|
| Reference: | Kritik von "Akademisk teologi som universell kunskapsform (2022)"
|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.51619/stk.v100i1.26096 |