‘Unorthodox’ Usages of the Term xabar in the Early Arabic Grammatical Tradition
This paper examines the term xabar. It focuses on cases where xabar, or the dyad ism-xabar, is used at variance with canonical theory. These cases suggest that the triad X + X's ism + X's xabar (familiar when X = ʾinna, kāna and their ‘sisters’) was used to accommodate tripartite configura...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2024
|
| In: |
Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2024, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 269-304 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1883809142 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240319162619.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240319s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jss/fgad027 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1883809142 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1883809142 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1161137955 |0 (DE-627)1024540553 |0 (DE-576)506375420 |4 aut |a Kasher, Almog |d 1977- | |
| 109 | |a Kasher, Almog 1977- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a ‘Unorthodox’ Usages of the Term xabar in the Early Arabic Grammatical Tradition |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper examines the term xabar. It focuses on cases where xabar, or the dyad ism-xabar, is used at variance with canonical theory. These cases suggest that the triad X + X's ism + X's xabar (familiar when X = ʾinna, kāna and their ‘sisters’) was used to accommodate tripartite configurations whose so-called xabar is not a predicate, or whose ism and xabar are generally taken to be mubtadaʾ and xabar. This syntactic model, which differs significantly from the canonical theory of sentence types in the Arabic grammatical tradition, was most probably designed for pedagogical aims. This alternative model analyzes sentences according to their surface structure, with focus on initial constituents, whereas canonical syntactic model's point of departure is a distinction between sentence types, based on the concept of predication and taking into consideration word order variation. An appendix on the little-known grammarian al-Quhunduzī examines the history of the figure, who has in modern scholarship been confused with another author. Pinning down his identity and the period in which he lived dispels confusion about the figure, allowing us to better place his work in the scholarly record. | ||
| 601 | |a Grammatik | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of Semitic studies |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1956 |g 69(2024), 1, Seite 269-304 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341339423 |w (DE-600)2066649-4 |w (DE-576)100202497 |x 1477-8556 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:69 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:269-304 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgad027 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4501748761 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1883809142 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240319160002 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240319||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||