Ethics After Comparative Religious Ethics: Rereading Little and Twiss in a Pragmatic Light

This paper presents a rereading of David Little and Sumner Twiss's Comparative Religious Ethics in the context of its initial reception and legacy within the field of religious ethics and argues that we can read it more charitably as a piece of pragmatism rather than as a work of formalism or s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lee, Jung H. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2024
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2024, Volume: 52, Issue: 1, Pages: 71-94
Further subjects:B Ethnography
B Positivism
B John Ladd
B Jeffrey Stout
B comparative religious ethics
B Sumner Twiss
B David Little
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 188303812X
003 DE-627
005 20240309055507.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240309s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/jore.12450  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)188303812X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP188303812X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lee, Jung H.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ethics After Comparative Religious Ethics: Rereading Little and Twiss in a Pragmatic Light 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper presents a rereading of David Little and Sumner Twiss's Comparative Religious Ethics in the context of its initial reception and legacy within the field of religious ethics and argues that we can read it more charitably as a piece of pragmatism rather than as a work of formalism or semi-formalism. If one does not read Little and Twiss as committed positivists concerned with realizing a specific research program associated with the “twilight of logical empiricism,” then their theoretical and methodological recommendations, illustrated in their case studies, appear more pragmatic in nature and less excessively rigid. By rereading Comparative Religious Ethics in this light, we can see more clearly its relevance for the field today, particularly regarding the fundamental importance of the discursive activity of practical reasoning, or the game of giving and asking for reasons, in the study of religious ethics. 
601 |a Pragmatik 
650 4 |a Jeffrey Stout 
650 4 |a John Ladd 
650 4 |a Positivism 
650 4 |a Ethnography 
650 4 |a Sumner Twiss 
650 4 |a David Little 
650 4 |a comparative religious ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of religious ethics  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973  |g 52(2024), 1, Seite 71-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320450171  |w (DE-600)2005952-8  |w (DE-576)090888812  |x 1467-9795  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:52  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:71-94 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jore.12450  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12450  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12450  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4498952316 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 188303812X 
LOK |0 005 20240309055507 
LOK |0 008 240309||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-03-08#75C7E6685C584F4909CE7C4E37FFAA33CEE1139E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL