The Rebuilding and Settlement of Jerusalem in Ezra-Nehemiah and 1 Esdras
This paper reviews Dieter Böhler’s theory about the conception of Jerusalem in MT Ezra Nehemiah and 1 Esdras. According to Böhler, 1 Esdras preserves earlier versions in variants dealing with the rebuilding and settlement of Jerusalem, while the MT was revised to accommodate Ezra (and Neh 8) to the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2023
|
| In: |
TC
Year: 2023, Volume: 28, Pages: 1-18 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1880523957 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240212134653.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240212s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1880523957 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1880523957 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1045015474 |0 (DE-627)773419144 |0 (DE-576)182163288 |4 aut |a Pakkala, Juha |d 1968- | |
| 109 | |a Pakkala, Juha 1968- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Rebuilding and Settlement of Jerusalem in Ezra-Nehemiah and 1 Esdras |c Juha Pakkala |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper reviews Dieter Böhler’s theory about the conception of Jerusalem in MT Ezra Nehemiah and 1 Esdras. According to Böhler, 1 Esdras preserves earlier versions in variants dealing with the rebuilding and settlement of Jerusalem, while the MT was revised to accommodate Ezra (and Neh 8) to the Nehemiah story. This paper argues that Böhler’s theory is highly unlikely. It is based on things lacking in the MT, while there is little positive evidence for the theory in the MT variants. The theory also neglects many passages that contradict the conception of an unsettled and unbuilt Jerusalem before Nehemiah. Textual variants used in favor of the theory are often controversial, heavily edited, and/or the result of textual corruption. In none of the cases does 1 Esdras unambiguously preserve the original reading. A conceptional connection between the MT variants remains unclear or is based on the variants in 1 Esdras. The 1 Esdras variants are connected by Jerusalem, its physical spaces, and temple gates. This may be an attempt to highlight the accomplishments of the Davidic Zerubbabel, which fits well with the anti-Hasmonean stand of 1 Esdras. Nehemiah and his accomplishments (such as references to the wall) were omitted because he was a non-Davidic leader whose memory 1 Esdras sought to eradicate. | ||
| 601 | |a Jerusalem | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t TC |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 1996 |g 28(2023), Seite 1-18 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320636305 |w (DE-600)2024557-9 |w (DE-576)273879162 |x 1089-7747 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2023 |g pages:1-18 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://jbtc.org/v28/TC-2023_Pakkala.pdf |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 28 |j 2023 |h 1-18 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4483112767 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1880523957 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240212134653 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240212||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 2 |b www |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a inzs | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| SUB | |a BIB | ||