Mysticism and Practical Rationality Exploring Evelyn Underhill through the Lens of Phronesis

This paper aims to justify that mysticism can be considered rational from the perspective of practical reason. Particularly, we will argue that mysticism embodies the oxymoron inherent in practical wisdom (phronesis), namely, an ordered openness. Our roadmap for substantiating this hypothesis is as...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pérez Lasserre, Diego (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2024
In: Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 2
Further subjects:B ordered openness
B Mysticism
B Evelyn Underhill
B Practical Reason
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 188002196X
003 DE-627
005 20240206055505.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240206s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel15020197  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)188002196X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP188002196X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pérez Lasserre, Diego  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Mysticism and Practical Rationality Exploring Evelyn Underhill through the Lens of Phronesis 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper aims to justify that mysticism can be considered rational from the perspective of practical reason. Particularly, we will argue that mysticism embodies the oxymoron inherent in practical wisdom (phronesis), namely, an ordered openness. Our roadmap for substantiating this hypothesis is as follows: we will start by explaining that if the concept of rationality is approached in a scientistic manner, then mysticism cannot be deemed rational. We will employ Kant’s approach to rationality to support this assertion (2). Next, we will demonstrate that while the modern scientific approach to rationality is effective for fields of study where the subject matter typically unfolds in a regular or predictable manner, it proves insufficient in dimensions of existence that resist normative descriptions. In this section, following Aristotle and Gadamer, we will contend that theoretical reason should be complemented by practical reason, which is characterized by normative openness (3). Finally, we will argue that mysticism, although not rational from a theoretical viewpoint, is indeed rational from a practical standpoint (4). To avoid inappropriate generalizations when discussing mysticism, the third section will be centered on the work of Evelyn Underhill. 
601 |a Underhill, Evelyn 
601 |a Phronesis 
650 4 |a Evelyn Underhill 
650 4 |a ordered openness 
650 4 |a Practical Reason 
650 4 |a Mysticism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 15(2024), 2, Artikel-ID 197  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2024  |g number:2  |g elocationid:197 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/2/197/pdf?version=1707114077  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020197  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/2/197  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2024  |e 2  |i 197 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4477356048 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 188002196X 
LOK |0 005 20240206055505 
LOK |0 008 240206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-02-05#CAEEBEF837126905F032316E2F04FA410B4F687C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL