A propósito de la sentencia «coram» Pinto de 26 de marzo de 1999: Notas sobre la responsabilidad contractual y la responsabilidad aquiliana en Derecho canónico
The coram Pinto Judgment (26 March 1999) enables an exploration, from a historical perspective, of the scope and meaning of the canonization of civil law in relation to obligations and liability. The canonization of civil laws concerning compensation for damages is supported by the canonical traditi...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[publisher not identified]
2023
|
| In: |
Ius canonicum
Year: 2023, Volume: 63, Issue: 126, Pages: 841-878 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Canon law
/ Contract law
/ Liability
/ Decretals
/ Roman law
|
| IxTheo Classification: | SB Catholic Church law XA Law |
| Further subjects: | B
Responsabilidad contractual
B Canonización de leyes civiles B Decretalistas B Responsabilidad aquiliana B Derecho de decretales B Derecho romano |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The coram Pinto Judgment (26 March 1999) enables an exploration, from a historical perspective, of the scope and meaning of the canonization of civil law in relation to obligations and liability. The canonization of civil laws concerning compensation for damages is supported by the canonical tradition. The sources of c. 128 CIC 83 are not to be found in CIC 17, but in the chapters of the title De (iniuris et) damno dato of the ius novum, as well as in the rules of the ius romanum which the Decretalists used to interpret this rubric in a systematic way. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2254-6219 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Ius canonicum
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.15581/016.126.009 |