From representation to power: the Bilderverbot reconsidered

When considered in the field of aesthetics, the Bilderverbot (biblical ban on pictures) is received with a variety of attitudes ranging between the extremes of Kant’s praise and Hegel’s criticism. Despite being at odds with each other, Kant’s and Hegel’s interpretations suffer from the same theoreti...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fortis, Beniamino (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2023
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 84, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 275-293
Further subjects:B Nietzsche
B Picture
B Hegel
B Idolatry
B Power
B Kant
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1879371545
003 DE-627
005 20240127055510.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240127s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2024.2302835  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1879371545 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1879371545 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Fortis, Beniamino  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a From representation to power: the Bilderverbot reconsidered 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When considered in the field of aesthetics, the Bilderverbot (biblical ban on pictures) is received with a variety of attitudes ranging between the extremes of Kant’s praise and Hegel’s criticism. Despite being at odds with each other, Kant’s and Hegel’s interpretations suffer from the same theoretical flaw: both assume that the pictures the Bible talks about are representations related to their objects by way of reference. This assumption is proven wrong in the pars destruens of this essay, in which it will be argued that using the notion of ‘representation’ as a key to the reading of the Bilderverbot is a misconception that leads to an anachronistic and partial view of the matter. The concept of ‘gaze,’ elaborated by Régis Debray and other scholars of visual studies, is introduced in the pars construens of this essay to show that the biblical prohibition is actually aimed at a different kind of pictures, to wit at presentifications, which, instead of referring to their objects in a representational way, are rather thought to embody and dominate them. In conclusion, through Nietzsche’s insights into the reasons behind religious cults, the point is finally made that the notion of ‘power’ surpasses that of ‘representation’ in capturing and accounting for the authentic meaning of the Bilderverbot. 
601 |a Bilderverbot 
650 4 |a Power 
650 4 |a Idolatry 
650 4 |a Picture 
650 4 |a Nietzsche 
650 4 |a Hegel 
650 4 |a Kant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 84(2023), 3/4, Seite 275-293  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)731333985  |w (DE-600)2692945-4  |w (DE-576)381266621  |x 2169-2335  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:84  |g year:2023  |g number:3/4  |g pages:275-293 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2024.2302835  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 84  |j 2023  |e 3/4  |h 275-293 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 446870036X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1879371545 
LOK |0 005 20240127055510 
LOK |0 008 240127||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-01-26#D99BF83B54ED33059EA2F3D59ECD63C0C9524660 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw