Forging the Philosopher?: Epistolarity and Pseudo-documentarism in Philostratus's Life of Apollonius

Emerging from scholarship on ancient fiction, »pseudo-documentarism« describes the invocation of fabricated sources in a narrative work. This article places pseudodocumentarism intoaconstellation of attributive practices, of which pseudepigraphy is also a part, that work to shape the identity of a p...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Fewster, Gregory P. (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2023
Dans: Early christianity
Année: 2023, Volume: 14, Numéro: 4, Pages: 529-547
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Philostratus, Atheniensis ca. 3. Jh. / Philostratus, Flavius 160-245, Vita Apollonii / Pseudépigraphie
Classifications IxTheo:BD Religions européennes anciennes
KAB Christianisme primitif
TB Antiquité
Sujets non-standardisés:B ApolloniusofTyana
B Characterization
B Caractères d'imprimerie
B pseudo-documentarism
B Memoirs
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Emerging from scholarship on ancient fiction, »pseudo-documentarism« describes the invocation of fabricated sources in a narrative work. This article places pseudodocumentarism intoaconstellation of attributive practices, of which pseudepigraphy is also a part, that work to shape the identity of a purported »author.« To do so, it analyzes an assemblage of letters attributed to the first-century wonderworker Apollonius of Tyana and their deployment in his only extant biography, composed by the third-century sophist Philostratus of Athens. Through a narratological reading of the Life of Apollonius, this article traces the subtle pseudo-documentarist strategies - the invocation of Apollonian letters - by which Philostratus characterizes his biographical subject as the supreme Pythagorean philosopher, as an alternative to the magician whom his detractors present.
ISSN:1868-8020
Contient:Enthalten in: Early christianity
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1628/ec-2023-0035