Foregrounding African Ontology/Epistemology: A Reading of Deuteronomy 23:3 and Ruth 4:18–22 Considering the Nature of God

Deuteronomy 23:3, says: “No … Moabite may enter the assembly of the Lord”. This verse is motivated by a discriminatory tendency embedded in the ontology of the Deuteronomist. Interestingly, Deuteronomy 23:3 was used by Ezra-Nehemiah to discriminate against the “Moabites” during the Second Temple. Su...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cezula, Ntozakhe Simon (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI 2024
In: Religions
Year: 2024, Volume: 15, Issue: 1
Further subjects:B Ubuntu
B Discrimination
B Ontology
B Epistemology
B African ontology
B Culture
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1878474049
003 DE-627
005 20240119055505.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240119s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel15010125  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1878474049 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1878474049 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cezula, Ntozakhe Simon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Cezula, Ntozakhe Simon  |a Cezula, Ntozakhe 
245 1 0 |a Foregrounding African Ontology/Epistemology: A Reading of Deuteronomy 23:3 and Ruth 4:18–22 Considering the Nature of God 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Deuteronomy 23:3, says: “No … Moabite may enter the assembly of the Lord”. This verse is motivated by a discriminatory tendency embedded in the ontology of the Deuteronomist. Interestingly, Deuteronomy 23:3 was used by Ezra-Nehemiah to discriminate against the “Moabites” during the Second Temple. Such ontology is countered by the author of Ruth in the narrative of Ruth during the Second Temple. This demonstrates an ontological “war” within the Bible itself. The primary contestation lies in whether God is exclusive or inclusive. This development necessitates a hermeneutics of suspicion. In the course of history, the “theology” of Deuteronomy has been used to grossly violate the human dignity of many God-fearing African people and many other people of the South for colonial purposes. To exacerbate the situation, there were persistent attempts from some quarters to universalise such a discriminatory biblical perspective. This would feed into the centre–periphery arrangement, with the centre feeding the periphery with such hermeneutics. For this reason, African scholars are implored to be very vigilant against ardent pressures put on the biblical texts by ontological, epistemological, and contextual biases of interpretations. Accordingly, Andrew Mbuvi identifies African Biblical Hermeneutics perfectly when he says it seeks to undo “the very construct of the ‘centre-periphery’ binary by allowing the possibility of multiple centres”). Kenneth Ngwa, thus, rightly asserts that African Biblical Hermeneutics considers African epistemologies and conditions “to be invaluable and legitimate contexts and resources in biblical interpretation”), drinking from our own wells). In consequence, this paper intends to set a dialogue between Deuteronomy 23:3 and Ruth 4:18–22. This paper aims to examine the understanding of God behind these verses. This paper will then compare the two theologies with the African philosophical concept of God. Harnessing the African concept of Ubuntu, this paper will de-ideologise the two texts and thus will provide a recommendation concerning the two texts. 
601 |a Ontologie 
650 4 |a Ubuntu 
650 4 |a Ontology 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a Discrimination 
650 4 |a Culture 
650 4 |a African ontology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 15(2024), 1, Artikel-ID 125  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g elocationid:125 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/1/125/pdf?version=1705568319  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010125  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/1/125  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 15  |j 2024  |e 1  |i 125 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4462444159 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1878474049 
LOK |0 005 20240119055505 
LOK |0 008 240119||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2024-01-18#E879ED16C94A5404BC6A980C8DC114FBF776EA46 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Ubuntu 
STB 0 0 |a Ubuntu 
STC 0 0 |a Ubuntu 
STD 0 0 |a Ubuntu 
STG 0 0 |a Ubuntu 
STH 0 0 |a Убунту (философия) 
STI 0 0 |a Ουμπούντου (φιλοσοφία) 
SUB |a REL