Who Will Take upon Himself to Contradict the Shulḥan ‘Arukh?: Mourning Suicide as a Case Study of Halakhic Authorities Leading the Process of Halakhic Change

This article presents a case study of a halakhic innovation led by Orthodox authorities: in a watershed ruling on mourning a suicide, the Ḥatam Sofer allowed families of suicides to mourn. The exemplar par excellence of Orthodoxy and coiner of its supposed motto "the novel is prohibited by the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sariel, Eliezer (Author) ; Sariel, Aviram (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: University of Pennsylvania Press 2023
In: AJS review
Year: 2023, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 392-418
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1877076538
003 DE-627
005 20240104173100.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240102s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1353/ajs.2023.a911528  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1877076538 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1877076538 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1201494249  |0 (DE-627)1685368980  |4 aut  |a Sariel, Eliezer 
109 |a Sariel, Eliezer 
245 1 0 |a Who Will Take upon Himself to Contradict the Shulḥan ‘Arukh?  |b Mourning Suicide as a Case Study of Halakhic Authorities Leading the Process of Halakhic Change  |c Eliezer Sariel, Aviram Sariel 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article presents a case study of a halakhic innovation led by Orthodox authorities: in a watershed ruling on mourning a suicide, the Ḥatam Sofer allowed families of suicides to mourn. The exemplar par excellence of Orthodoxy and coiner of its supposed motto "the novel is prohibited by the Torah," Sofer headed a ruling both novel and permissive. Further, the bulk of his responsum is explicitly dedicated to confronting the Shulḥan ‘arukh. In our opinion, Sofer contended with a substantial challenge to the halakhic system presented by Saul Berlin in his controversial book, Besamim Rosh. We trace commonalities between Berlin and Sofer and note their differences. Consequently, we demonstrate how historical analysis must include rabbinic polemics and study their efforts to preserve the accountability and rationality of the Halakhah. 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)128062843X  |0 (DE-627)1834105080  |4 aut  |a Sariel, Aviram 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Association for Jewish Studies  |t AJS review  |d Philadelphia, PA : University of Pennsylvania Press, 1976  |g 47(2023), 2, Seite 392-418  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)35625125X  |w (DE-600)2091701-6  |w (DE-576)120704218  |x 1475-4541  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:47  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g pages:392-418 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1353/ajs.2023.a911528  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/56/article/911528  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
936 u w |d 47  |j 2023  |e 2  |h 392-418 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4446292765 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1877076538 
LOK |0 005 20240102190652 
LOK |0 008 240102||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b www  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs  |a inzo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB