Ethical climate in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BackgroundEthical climate refers to the shared perception of ethical norms and sets the scope for what is ethical and acceptable behaviour within teams.AimThis paper sought to explore perceptions of ethical climate amongst healthcare workers as measured by the Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ), th...
Authors: | ; ; ; ; ; ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2023
|
In: |
Nursing ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 30, Issue: 7/8, Pages: 910-921 |
Further subjects: | B
Systematic Review
B Ethical Climate B Meta-analysis |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1876842458 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231222055506.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231222s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/09697330231177419 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1876842458 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1876842458 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Essex, Ryan |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ethical climate in healthcare: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a BackgroundEthical climate refers to the shared perception of ethical norms and sets the scope for what is ethical and acceptable behaviour within teams.AimThis paper sought to explore perceptions of ethical climate amongst healthcare workers as measured by the Ethical Climate Questionnaire (ECQ), the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey (HECS) and the Ethics Environment Questionnaire (EEQ).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was utilised. PSYCINFO, CINAHL, WEB OF SCIENCE, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched, and papers were included if they sampled healthcare workers and used the ECQ, HECS or EEQ.Ethical considerationEthical approval was not required.ResultsThe search returned 1020 results. After screening, 61 papers were included (n = 43 HECS, n = 15 ECQ, n = 3 EEQ). The overall sample size was over 17,000. The pooled mean score for the HECS was 3.60. Mean scores of individual studies ranged from 2.97 to 4.5. For the HECS studies, meta-regression was carried out. No relationship was found between the country of the studies, the study setting (ICU v non-ICU settings) or the mean years of experience that the sample had. For the ECQ, sub-scales had mean scores ranging from 3.41 (instrumental) to 4.34 (law) and were all observed to have significant and substantial heterogeneity. Three studies utilised the EEQ so further analysis was not carried out.ConclusionsThe above results provide insight into the variability of scores as measured by the HECS, ECQ and EEQ. To some extent, this variability is not surprising with studies carried out across 21 countries and in a range of healthcare systems. Results also suggest that it may be that more local and context specific factors are more important when it comes to predicting ethical climate. | ||
601 | |a Systematik | ||
650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Ethical Climate | |
700 | 1 | |a Thompson, Trevor |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Evans, Thomas Rhys |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fortune, Vanessa |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kalocsányiová, Erika |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Miller, Denise |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Markowski, Marianne |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Elliott, Helen |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nursing ethics |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1994 |g 30(2023), 7/8, Seite 910-921 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)324869460 |w (DE-600)2031461-9 |w (DE-576)273866605 |x 1477-0989 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2023 |g number:7/8 |g pages:910-921 |
856 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/09697330231177419 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via page says license)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330231177419 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a NOMM | ||
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4443044345 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1876842458 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20231222055506 | ||
LOK | |0 008 231222||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-12-21#112285BC8ACC87C6FA829F3F4539DEC97647E785 | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |