Philosophical and Philological Debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn: From Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī to Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī

The debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn (“on the subjects of medicine”) were initiated by Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī and continued by Afḍal al-Dīn al-Ḫūnaǧī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-Naḫǧawānī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-Sāmirī, Rafīʿ al-Dīn al-Ǧīlī, Ibn al-Nafīs, and Ibn al-Quff al-Masīḥī. In his own comment...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Eshera, Osama (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2023
In: Oriens
Year: 2023, Volume: 51, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 197-281
Further subjects:B Canon of Medicine
B Textual Criticism
B Epistemology
B post-classical commentary
B al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1876510803
003 DE-627
005 20231220055506.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231220s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/18778372-12340025  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1876510803 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1876510803 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Eshera, Osama  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Philosophical and Philological Debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn: From Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī to Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The debates on Kulliyyāt I.1.ii of Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn (“on the subjects of medicine”) were initiated by Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī and continued by Afḍal al-Dīn al-Ḫūnaǧī, Naǧm al-Dīn al-Naḫǧawānī, Yaʿqūb ibn Ġanāʾim al-Sāmirī, Rafīʿ al-Dīn al-Ǧīlī, Ibn al-Nafīs, and Ibn al-Quff al-Masīḥī. In his own commentary, entitled al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya, Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī preserved and scrutinized his predecessors’ commentaries, in order to offer what he believed to be more conclusive interpretations of Ibn Sīnā. Focusing on the introductory part of Kulliyyāt I.1.ii, we show that the commentators were divided not only on philosophical issues, but also on the very text that should be attributed to Ibn Sīnā. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Philologe 
650 4 |a Textual Criticism 
650 4 |a Epistemology 
650 4 |a post-classical commentary 
650 4 |a al-Tuḥfa al-saʿdiyya 
650 4 |a Canon of Medicine 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Oriens  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1948  |g 51(2023), 3/4, Seite 197-281  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)504272314  |w (DE-600)2213264-8  |w (DE-576)251711080  |x 1877-8372  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2023  |g number:3/4  |g pages:197-281 
856 |u https://brill.com/downloadpdf/journals/orie/aop/article-10.1163-18778372-12340025/article-10.1163-18778372-12340025.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/18778372-12340025  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/abstract/journals/orie/51/3-4/article-p197_1.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 444186891X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1876510803 
LOK |0 005 20231220055506 
LOK |0 008 231220||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-12-19#399357FB23520905D053B0C95E8F48DE0E160D4B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL