Précis of Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment

This paper summarizes Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment. The book’s central question is whether confident (ir)religious commitment can be rationally maintained in the face of systematic religious disagreement. Part i develops an account of the epistemic significance of disagreement a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pittard, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2023
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2023, Volume: 13, Issue: 4, Pages: 269-279
Further subjects:B conciliationism
B rational insight
B Impartiality
B religious skepticism
B religious disagreement
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1871129966
003 DE-627
005 20231126000846.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231125s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-bja10069  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1871129966 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1871129966 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1201053641  |0 (DE-627)1684196442  |4 aut  |a Pittard, John 
109 |a Pittard, John 
245 1 0 |a Précis of Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper summarizes Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment. The book’s central question is whether confident (ir)religious commitment can be rationally maintained in the face of systematic religious disagreement. Part i develops an account of the epistemic significance of disagreement and considers the implications of this account for religious belief. This part argues against the commitment of “strong conciliationists” to a rigorous form of epistemic impartiality, a commitment that underlies the strongest argument for disagreement-motivated religious skepticism. Part ii considers the implications for religious commitment if the impartiality constraint favored by strong conciliationists is correct. It is argued that the commitment to epistemic impartiality does not clearly support religious skepticism. However, such a commitment does induce a thoroughgoing normative uncertainty that arguably prevents one from rationally pursuing a religious (or explicitly irreligious) way of life. 
650 4 |a religious skepticism 
650 4 |a Impartiality 
650 4 |a rational insight 
650 4 |a conciliationism 
650 4 |a religious disagreement 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 13(2023), 4, Seite 269-279  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:13  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:269-279 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1163/22105700-bja10069  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://brill.com/view/journals/skep/13/4/article-p269_001.xml  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 13  |j 2023  |e 4  |h 269-279 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4417559007 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1871129966 
LOK |0 005 20231125055504 
LOK |0 008 231125||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-11-24#CBB5906AD58FAC3F09667958F4356E3A3E137875 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota  |a tiep 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL