The modal argument and Bailey's contingent physicalism: a rejoinder
Philosophy is experiencing a resurgence of property (PD) and generic substance dualism (SD). One important argument for SD that has played a role in this resurgence is some version of a modal argument. Until recently, premise (3) of the argument (Possibly, I exist, and no wholly physical objects exi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
2023
|
In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2023, Volume: 59, Issue: 4, Pages: 817-835 |
Further subjects: | B
modal argument
B Categories B mereological aggregates B Andrew Bailey B Via Negativa B contingent physicalism |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1869734157 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231108163504.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231108s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412522000580 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1869734157 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1869734157 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)124556760 |0 (DE-627)363419322 |0 (DE-576)165749229 |4 aut |a Moreland, James Porter |d 1948- | |
109 | |a Moreland, James Porter 1948- |a Porter Moreland, James 1948- |a Moreland, J. P. 1948- | ||
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The modal argument and Bailey's contingent physicalism |b a rejoinder |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Philosophy is experiencing a resurgence of property (PD) and generic substance dualism (SD). One important argument for SD that has played a role in this resurgence is some version of a modal argument. Until recently, premise (3) of the argument (Possibly, I exist, and no wholly physical objects exist.) has garnered most of the attention by critics. However, more recently, the focus has also been on (2) (Wholly physical objects are essentially, wholly, and intrinsically physical and wholly spiritual substances are essentially, wholly, and intrinsically immaterial.). Andrew Bailey has provided one of the best criticisms of (2) on offer. In what follows, I present and clarify one form of the argument and defend premise (2) by responding to important defeaters proffered by Andrew Bailey and his contingent physicalism. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Andrew Bailey | |
650 | 4 | |a Categories | |
650 | 4 | |a contingent physicalism | |
650 | 4 | |a mereological aggregates | |
650 | 4 | |a modal argument | |
650 | 4 | |a Via Negativa | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 59(2023), 4, Seite 817-835 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:817-835 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412522000580 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/modal-argument-and-baileys-contingent-physicalism-a-rejoinder/D7AD23DF655157585E0ED6091735DA05 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4404252455 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1869734157 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20231108163014 | ||
LOK | |0 008 231108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |