Relational approaches in bioethics: A guide to their differences

Contemporary critical approaches to bioethics increasingly present themselves as “relational,” though the meaning of relationality and its implications for bioethics seem to be many and varying. I argue that this confusion is due to a multiplicity of relational approaches originating from distinct t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gary, Mercer (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
In: Bioethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 37, Issue: 8, Pages: 733-740
IxTheo Classification:NBE Anthropology
NCC Social ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
Further subjects:B relational theory
B relational autonomy
B Care Ethics
B relational ethics
B feminist bioethics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1860830978
003 DE-627
005 20231010121935.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231006s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13200  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1860830978 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1860830978 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gary, Mercer  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Relational approaches in bioethics: A guide to their differences 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Contemporary critical approaches to bioethics increasingly present themselves as “relational,” though the meaning of relationality and its implications for bioethics seem to be many and varying. I argue that this confusion is due to a multiplicity of relational approaches originating from distinct theoretical lineages. In this article, I identify four key differences among commonly referenced relational approaches: the scope and nature of relationships considered, the extent of the determining influence on individual selfhood, and the integrity of individual selfhood. Importantly, these four differences carry consequences for the usage of relational approaches within academic and clinical bioethics. I show that these differences attach to multiple objects of critique within mainstream bioethics and imply distinct metaethical commitments. Although I issue a cautionary note about combining relational approaches from distinct lineages, I close by suggesting that many such approaches may have their use, drawing on Susan Sherwin's sense of bioethical theories as lenses. 
650 4 |a relational theory 
650 4 |a relational ethics 
650 4 |a relational autonomy 
650 4 |a feminist bioethics 
650 4 |a Care Ethics 
652 |a NBE:NCC:NCJ 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 37(2023), 8, Seite 733-740  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2023  |g number:8  |g pages:733-740 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13200  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13200  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 37  |j 2023  |e 8  |h 733-740 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4381688376 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1860830978 
LOK |0 005 20231010121935 
LOK |0 008 231006||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-09-22#F306E62F582A88DB0EAED11E36D03EB7DCC72FAB 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205283X  |a NCC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw