Contributory Reasons For and Against Procreation: Reply to Grill
Procreative limitarians, according to Kalle Grill, believe that we - especially the globally wealthy - should limit our procreative behaviors in order to reduce our impact on the natural environment. However, according to Grill, limitarians tend not to perform a complete moral analysis of procreatin...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas
2023
|
| In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 45, Issue: 3, Pages: 287-293 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1859131557 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230908103519.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230908s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/enviroethics20238861 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1859131557 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1859131557 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1198891653 |0 (DE-627)1681048604 |4 aut |a Rieder, Travis N. | |
| 109 | |a Rieder, Travis N. |a Rieder, Travis | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Contributory Reasons For and Against Procreation |b Reply to Grill |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Procreative limitarians, according to Kalle Grill, believe that we - especially the globally wealthy - should limit our procreative behaviors in order to reduce our impact on the natural environment. However, according to Grill, limitarians tend not to perform a complete moral analysis of procreating, as they cite the costs without noting the substantial benefits. In particular, Grill argues that procreation has benefits that consumption lacks, which is relevant for deciding where to focus in our efforts to mitigate environmental harms. As one of the limitarians cited by Grill, I think this is an interesting argument to consider, but I will here suggest that it does not succeed in fully responding to the force of the limitarian position. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Environmental ethics |d Denton, Tex. : Center for Environmental Philosophy, University of North Texas, 1979 |g 45(2023), 3, Seite 287-293 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341349410 |w (DE-600)2067662-1 |w (DE-576)459254057 |x 2153-7895 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:287-293 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Grill, Kalle |t Procreation vs. Consumption |d 2023 |w (DE-627)1859130682 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics20238861 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=enviroethics&id=enviroethics_2023_0045_0003_0287_0293 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4373936668 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1859131557 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230908103519 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230908||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||