"Decretalism" Is (Still) Not "Occasionalism": Reply to Larmer
In "Koperski's New (Improved?) Decretalism," Robert Larmer argues that my version of nomological realism about the laws of nature logically entails occasionalism. Here I clarify and defend my view against this charge. The main disagreement is whether a proper account of the laws of na...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Evangelical Philosophical Society
2023
|
In: |
Philosophia Christi
Year: 2023, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 117-125 |
IxTheo Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | In "Koperski's New (Improved?) Decretalism," Robert Larmer argues that my version of nomological realism about the laws of nature logically entails occasionalism. Here I clarify and defend my view against this charge. The main disagreement is whether a proper account of the laws of nature must involve dynamic production - what is commonly called oomph. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2640-2580 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Koperski's New (Improved?) Decretalism (2023)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Philosophia Christi
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/pc20232519 |