The X-Claim Debunking Argument and Theistic Mooreanism
According to Stephen Law's "X-claim argument," the theist's acquiring (what I call) an "x-claim defeater" automatically provides the theist with a reason to give up her x-claim belief. Contrary to Law, I argue that, even if the theist acquires such a defeater, it does n...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Evangelical Philosophical Society
2023
|
| In: |
Philosophia Christi
Year: 2023, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 61-73 |
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1858404924 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230925093203.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230831s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5840/pc20232515 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1858404924 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1858404924 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1077794924 |0 (DE-627)837511097 |0 (DE-576)44668130X |4 aut |a Ruloff, C. P. |d 1967- | |
| 109 | |a Ruloff, C. P. 1967- |a Ruloff, Colin P. 1967- |a Ruloff, Colin 1967- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The X-Claim Debunking Argument and Theistic Mooreanism |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a According to Stephen Law's "X-claim argument," the theist's acquiring (what I call) an "x-claim defeater" automatically provides the theist with a reason to give up her x-claim belief. Contrary to Law, I argue that, even if the theist acquires such a defeater, it does not follow that the theist ought to give up her x-claim belief. This is because the degree of justification possessed by the theist's belief may be sufficient to epistemically insulate itself against the x-claim defeater that was initially brought against it. Hence, the theist may be justified in maintaining her x-claim belief. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB | ||
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)123840325 |0 (DE-627)08547357X |0 (DE-576)185120512 |4 ant |a Law, Stephen |d 1960- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophia Christi |d La Mirada, CA : Evangelical Philosophical Society, 1999 |g 25(2023), 1, Seite 61-73 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)1777455340 |w (DE-600)3100949-9 |x 2640-2580 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:61-73 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Law, Stephen, 1960 - |t The X-claim argument against religious belief |d 2018 |w (DE-627)156980480X |w (DE-576)499804805 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.5840/pc20232515 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.pdcnet.org/pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=pc&id=pc_2023_0025_0001_0061_0073 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 25 |j 2023 |e 1 |h 61-73 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4371212182 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1858404924 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230925012739 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230831||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||