A New Explanation of Why the Euthyphro Dilemma Is a False Dilemma
The article gives a new explanation for why the Euthyphro dilemma is a false dilemma and argues that it is a middle position that both the theist and the atheist could accept. The argument is that both the will of God and the preferences of individuals are necessary truthmakers for what the good is....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
2023
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2023, Volume: 14, Issue: 8 |
| Further subjects: | B
the Euthyphro dilemma
B God and morality B Metaethics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1856151298 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230816054812.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230815s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel14081038 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1856151298 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1856151298 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1057897965 |0 (DE-627)79538016X |0 (DE-576)347216153 |4 aut |a Søvik, Atle Ottesen |d 1977- | |
| 109 | |a Søvik, Atle Ottesen 1977- |a Søvik, Atle O. 1977- |a Søvik, Atle 1977- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A New Explanation of Why the Euthyphro Dilemma Is a False Dilemma |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The article gives a new explanation for why the Euthyphro dilemma is a false dilemma and argues that it is a middle position that both the theist and the atheist could accept. The argument is that both the will of God and the preferences of individuals are necessary truthmakers for what the good is. Each of the components is insufficient on its own, but jointly they are sufficient. Individual preferences are necessary to provide the normativity of the good, while God is necessary for the objectivity of the good. It is the combination of individual preferences into a possible world that is valuated the most by the most that gives the normative goal for moral choices. It is the knowledge of God of what would most probably be valuated the most by the most that makes a concrete choice the morally right thing to do in a concrete situation. | ||
| 601 | |a Dilemma | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God and morality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a the Euthyphro dilemma | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 14(2023), 8, Artikel-ID 1038 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2023 |g number:8 |g elocationid:1038 |
| 856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/8/1038/pdf?version=1691996947 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14081038 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/8/1038 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4366174189 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1856151298 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230815055514 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230815||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-08-14#6ED02677A8B4D3937CB5FC612C13876D2588657D | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||