Let's join forces: institutional resilience and multistakeholder partnerships in crises

Institutional resilience refers to the capacity of institutions to deal with adversity. Crises are a major source of adversity. However, we poorly understand the relations between institutional resilience and crises. Through a comparative process tracing across three European countries, I investigat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krlev, Gorgi (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2023
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 186, Issue: 3, Pages: 571-592
Further subjects:B Institutional resilience
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Multistakeholder partnerships
B Crises
B Work integration
B Morals
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1855032635
003 DE-627
005 20230906142251.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230809s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10551-022-05231-w  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1855032635 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1855032635 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Krlev, Gorgi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Let's join forces  |b institutional resilience and multistakeholder partnerships in crises  |c Gorgi Krlev 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Institutional resilience refers to the capacity of institutions to deal with adversity. Crises are a major source of adversity. However, we poorly understand the relations between institutional resilience and crises. Through a comparative process tracing across three European countries, I investigate how multistakeholder partnerships in work integration contributed to institutional resilience in response to the economic and the refugee crises. I present these foremost as moral crises, where public, private, and nonprofit actors choose to engage or not engage out of a sense of responsibility. I develop a framework and research propositions on how multistakeholder collaboration may increase institutional resilience when it is affected by moral crises and make three contributions: First, in contrast to the destructive effects of crises often stressed, I identify pull and push factors triggered by moral crises that may galvanize fragmented efforts into joint action. Second, I conceptualize nested contingencies of institutional resilience, by explaining how resilience is affected by interaction between (1) the capacity of existing institutions and the level of adversity produced by crises and (2) institutional precursors that new actor constellations can build on and crises challenge existing institutions directly or indirectly. Third, I conceptualize which type of actor is likely to take the lead, and under which context conditions, when multiple stakeholders engage in increasing institutional resilience. I derive implications on how anticipatory embedded agency can prevent crises and how moral pro-activity may not only benefit institutional resilience, but also the organizations who choose to act. 
601 |a Institution 
650 4 |a Crises 
650 4 |a Institutional resilience 
650 4 |a Moral 
650 4 |a Multistakeholder partnerships 
650 4 |a Work integration 
655 4 |0 (DE-206)49  |a Aufsatz in Zeitschrift  |5 DE-206 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 186(2023), 3 vom: Sept., Seite 571-592  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:186  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g month:09  |g pages:571-592 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10551-022-05231-w.pdf?pdf=button  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05231-w  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig 
936 u w |d 186  |j 2023  |e 3  |c 9  |h 571-592 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4373175438 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1855032635 
LOK |0 005 20230906142251 
LOK |0 008 230906||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Morals,Morals 
STB 0 0 |a Morale,Morale 
STC 0 0 |a Moral,Moral 
STD 0 0 |a Morale,Morale 
STE 0 0 |a 道德,道德 
STF 0 0 |a 道德,道德 
STG 0 0 |a Moral,Moral 
STH 0 0 |a Мораль (мотив),Мораль 
STI 0 0 |a Ήθος (μοτίβο),Ήθος