Karl Barth and James Cone on Atonement: Ambiguity in Ontology and the Implications for Ethics
This paper interrogates critical divergence in interpreting the cross and atonement between James Cone and Karl Barth – and their related ethics. Cone rejects atonement theories and embraces the cross as an interpretative symbol that speaks to the suffering of Black Americans. In contrast, Barth res...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
2023
|
| In: |
Black theology
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 143-154 |
| Further subjects: | B
Reparations
B Ethics B Atonement B Cone B ontological blackness B Barth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |