Acceptance to Expedience: A Comparative Analysis of Ellen G. White and Arthur G. Daniells Counsel for Race Relations

This article offers a comparative analysis of Ellen G. White’s and Arthur G. Daniells’s positions concerning race relations. Through a careful survey of White’s writings—especially Testimonies to the Church, vol. 9, pp. 199-226 and The Southern Work—I argue that she never supported separationism. I...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruhumuliza, Jon-Philippe (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Andrews Univ. Press 2021
In: Andrews University Seminary studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 71-94
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1852273119
003 DE-627
005 20230710153500.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230710s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1852273119 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1852273119 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ruhumuliza, Jon-Philippe  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Acceptance to Expedience: A Comparative Analysis of Ellen G. White and Arthur G. Daniells Counsel for Race Relations 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article offers a comparative analysis of Ellen G. White’s and Arthur G. Daniells’s positions concerning race relations. Through a careful survey of White’s writings—especially Testimonies to the Church, vol. 9, pp. 199-226 and The Southern Work—I argue that she never supported separationism. I hypothesize that Adventist separationism gained precedence through Daniells’s selective compilation of White’s counsels in his 1906 response to the People’s Church. My findings unpack White’s beliefs in spiritual leadership and ministry. She called for workers able to simultaneously accommodate culture and undermine prejudice internally through the gospel. Her vision necessitated the adjustment of methods on a local level, and thus she opposed official race-based policies. Daniells’s eagerness to settle racial tensions led to a push for racial separation. He would interpret White’s "no policy" stance as justification for instituting a separationist policy in DC and ultimately wherever racial tensions existed. Effectively, Daniells created a hermeneutical method for aligning administrative initiatives with the writings of White and was critical in solidifying segregation within the Seventh- day Adventist Church. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a Andrews University. Seventh-Day Adventist Theological Seminary  |t Andrews University Seminary studies  |d Berrien Springs, Mich. : Andrews Univ. Press, 1963  |g 59(2021), 1, Seite 71-94  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)640379796  |w (DE-600)2574851-8  |w (DE-576)33069393X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:71-94 
856 4 0 |u https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/auss/vol59/iss1/4  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4351792779 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1852273119 
LOK |0 005 20230710133604 
LOK |0 008 230710||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw