Reframing Anselm and Aquinas on Atonement

Thomas Aquinas's vision of atonement is generally considered more conceptually expansive than Anselm of Canterbury's. Where Aquinas's multipartite account of Christ's passion incorporates a variety of biblical motifs, Anselm appears to narrow the focus to satisfactory debt-repaym...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cresswell, Rachel (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2023
In: New blackfriars
Year: 2023, Volume: 104, Issue: 1109, Pages: 39-56
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 4500
001 1848856717
003 DE-627
005 20230613091914.0
007 tu
008 230613s2023 xxk||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1848856717 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1848856717 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
044 |c XA-GB 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Cresswell, Rachel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Reframing Anselm and Aquinas on Atonement  |c Rachel Cresswell 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Thomas Aquinas's vision of atonement is generally considered more conceptually expansive than Anselm of Canterbury's. Where Aquinas's multipartite account of Christ's passion incorporates a variety of biblical motifs, Anselm appears to narrow the focus to satisfactory debt-repayment alone. This article proposes two approaches for reframing the comparison between the two accounts. I argue first that both Anselm and Aquinas considered debt-repayment necessary but not sufficient in itself to accomplish all that is needed for the remittance of sin and the restoration of humanity. For Anselm, as for Aquinas, Christ must also liberate captives, defeat the devil, amend Adam's sin by recapitulation and win merit in which his members participate. The first reframing thus locates Anselm in much closer proximity to Aquinas than has generally been supposed. The second reframing throws light on a significant divergence between the two. I argue that the kenotic trajectory of abasement and ascent, pictured in the Philippian hymn, is put to strikingly different use by each theologian. This second reframing throws into sharp relief Aquinas's emphasis on Christ's suffering as a theological priority which Anselm does not share. Looking to Anselm's Benedictine context, I contend, yields one possible means of accounting for this departure. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t New blackfriars  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1964  |g 104(2023), 1109, Seite 39-56  |w (DE-627)166756865  |w (DE-600)301995-0  |w (DE-576)015193896  |x 0028-4289  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:104  |g year:2023  |g number:1109  |g pages:39-56 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1831317958  |k Electronic 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4334142923 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1848856717 
LOK |0 005 20230613091914 
LOK |0 008 230613||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-2  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-2 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-2 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a knix 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw