Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician: the case of informed consent

This paper serves two purposes: first, the proposition of an ethical fiduciary theory that substantiates the often-cited assertion that the patient-physician relationship is fiduciary in nature; and second, the application of this theory to the case of informed consent. Patients’ decision-making pre...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs: Ludewigs, Sophie 1995- (Auteur) ; Narchi, Jonas 1994- (Auteur) ; Kiefer, Lukas (Auteur) ; Winkler, Eva C. 1971- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
WorldCat: WorldCat
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Publié: 2022
Dans: Journal of medical ethics
Année: 2025, Volume: 51, Numéro: 1, Pages: 59-66
Sujets non-standardisés:B Decision Making
B Informed Consent
B Health Personnel
B Ethics- Medical
B Philosophy
Accès en ligne: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1848821689
003 DE-627
005 20250310204235.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230612s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1136/jme-2022-108539  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1848821689 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1848821689 
035 |a (OCoLC)1389533646 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1292595221  |0 (DE-627)1848820291  |4 aut  |a Ludewigs, Sophie  |d 1995- 
109 |a Ludewigs, Sophie 1995- 
245 1 0 |a Ethics of the fiduciary relationship between patient and physician  |b the case of informed consent  |c Sophie Ludewigs, Jonas Narchi, Lukas Kiefer, Eva C. Winkler 
264 1 |c 2022 
300 |a 8 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Gesehen am 12.06.2023 
520 |a This paper serves two purposes: first, the proposition of an ethical fiduciary theory that substantiates the often-cited assertion that the patient-physician relationship is fiduciary in nature; and second, the application of this theory to the case of informed consent. Patients’ decision-making preferences vary significantly. While some seek fully autonomous decision-making, others prefer to delegate parts of their decision. Therefore, we propose an ethical fiduciary theory that allows physician and patient to jointly determine the physician’s role on a spectrum from fiduciary as advisor to fiduciary as agent. Drawing on legal concepts of the fiduciary relationship and on phenomenological accounts of obligation by Lévinas and Løgstrup, our theory relies on the key attributes of trust, vulnerability and otherness. Finally, practical implications of this theory for the informed consent process are developed: we propose a preassessment of patients’ risk and value profiles as well as a restructuring of the oral consent interview and the written consent materials. 
601 |a Patient 
650 4 |a Decision Making 
650 4 |a Ethics- Medical 
650 4 |a Health Personnel 
650 4 |a Informed Consent 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1207427756  |0 (DE-627)1693765896  |4 aut  |a Narchi, Jonas  |d 1994- 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1292595566  |0 (DE-627)1848821123  |4 aut  |a Kiefer, Lukas 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1055853065  |0 (DE-627)792734823  |0 (DE-576)411905384  |4 aut  |a Winkler, Eva C.  |d 1971- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of medical ethics  |d London : BMJ Publ., 1975  |g 51(2025), 1, Seite 59-66  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)323607802  |w (DE-600)2026397-1  |w (DE-576)260773972  |x 1473-4257  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:2025  |g number:1  |g pages:59-66  |g extent:8 
856 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/early/2022/12/22/jme-2022-108539.full.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2023/05/17/jme-2022-108539  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2022-108539  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://jme.bmj.com/content/51/1/59  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
889 |w (DE-627)1918816506 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4673341805 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1848821689 
LOK |0 005 20250226133419 
LOK |0 008 250226||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw