Sed nunquid species mulina maior est et dignior equina et asinina? L’allegoria come strumento del dibattito fra teologi e giuristi : dalla canonistica classica alla Riforma: Alcune note = Allegory as a tool f or the debate between theologians and jurists: from classical canon law to the reformation : Some notes
Nel XII e nel XIII secolo Stefano Tornacense e il cardinale Ostiense si erano soffermati sul tema dei rapporti fra teologia, diritto civile e diritto canonico, illustrando le connesse problematiche alla luce di alcune allegorie. Alla fine del xvi secolo una delle allegorie utilizzate da Enrico da...
| Subtitles: | Allegory as a tool f or the debate between theologians and jurists: from classical canon law to the reformation |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Serra
2022
|
| In: |
Ius ecclesiae
Year: 2022, Volume: 34, Issue: 2, Pages: 597-622 |
| IxTheo Classification: | SA Church law; state-church law SB Catholic Church law |
| Further subjects: | B
Henricus de Segusia 1200-1270
B Gentili, Alberico (1552-1608) B Rainolds, John (1549-1607) B Stephanus Tornacensis (1128-1203) B Reformation |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1846917840 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230629125042.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 230530s2022 xx ||||| 00| ||ita c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1846917840 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1846917840 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a ita |b eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1247764354 |0 (DE-627)1782370560 |4 aut |a Minnucci, Giovanni | |
| 109 | |a Minnucci, Giovanni | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sed nunquid species mulina maior est et dignior equina et asinina? L’allegoria come strumento del dibattito fra teologi e giuristi : dalla canonistica classica alla Riforma |b Alcune note = Allegory as a tool f or the debate between theologians and jurists: from classical canon law to the reformation : Some notes |c Giovanni Minnucci |
| 246 | 3 | 1 | |a Allegory as a tool f or the debate between theologians and jurists: from classical canon law to the reformation |b Some notes |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Nel XII e nel XIII secolo Stefano Tornacense e il cardinale Ostiense si erano soffermati sul tema dei rapporti fra teologia, diritto civile e diritto canonico, illustrando le connesse problematiche alla luce di alcune allegorie. Alla fine del xvi secolo una delle allegorie utilizzate da Enrico da Susa (theologia = scientia equina ; ius civile = scientia asinina ; ius canonicum = scientia mulina) viene usata criticamente da John Rainolds, teologo puritano, nel dibattito con Alberico Gentili, regius professor di civil law a Oxford. I due autorevoli professori intendono determinare, di scutendo anche il testo del grande canonista, quali siano le competenze del teologo e del giurista. | ||
| 520 | |a In the 12th and 13th centuries, Stefano Tornacense and the Cardinal Hostiensis focused on the relationship between theology, civil law, and canon law, illustrating some debate’s related issues by resorting to the device of allegory. At the end of the 16th century, one of the allegories employed by Henry of Susa (theologia = scientia equina ; ius civile = scientia asinina ; ius canonicum = scientia mulina) was critically used by a Puritan theologian, named John Rainolds, in the debate with Alberico Gentili, regius professor of civil law in Oxford. The two authoritative professors aimed at determining what were the competencies of the theologian and the jurist, also discussing the text of the great canonist. | ||
| 600 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)118753509 |0 (DE-627)079533752 |0 (DE-576)163189935 |a Stephanus |c Tornacensis |d 1128-1203 |2 gnd |
| 600 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)100945716 |0 (DE-627)076669947 |0 (DE-576)161493874 |a Henricus |c de Segusia |d 1200-1270 |2 gnd |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)100386520 |0 (DE-627)07662188X |0 (DE-576)288653130 |a Rainolds, John |d 1549-1607 |2 gnd |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)118902970 |0 (DE-627)136416969 |0 (DE-576)161087574 |a Gentili, Alberico |d 1552-1608 |2 gnd |
| 601 | |a Allegorie | ||
| 601 | |a Reformation | ||
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4048946-2 |0 (DE-627)104364165 |0 (DE-576)209079851 |a Reformation |2 gnd |
| 652 | |a SA:SB | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ius ecclesiae |d Pisa : Serra, 1989 |g 34(2022), 2, Seite 597-622 |w (DE-627)170286282 |w (DE-600)1035805-5 |w (DE-576)02311570X |x 1120-6462 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g pages:597-622 |
| 935 | |a DAKR | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 34 |j 2022 |e 2 |h 597-622 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| CAN | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4326854820 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1846917840 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230630133335 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230530||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-3 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-3 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053283 |a SA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053313 |a SB | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Reformation,Reformation,Reformation in art |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Réforme protestante,Réforme protestante |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Reforma,Reforma |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Riforma protestante,Riforma protestante |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教改革,宗教改革 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 宗教改革,宗教改革 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Reforma,Reforma |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Реформация (мотив),Реформация |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Προτεσταντική μεταρρύθμιση (μοτίβο),Προτεσταντική μεταρρύθμιση |
| SUB | |a CAN | ||
| SYA | 0 | 0 | |a Stephanus,Episcopus,1128-1203,Stephanus,von Tournai,1128-1203,Stefano,di Tournai,1128-1203,Stephanus,de Tornaco,1128-1203,Stephan,von Doornick,1128-1203,Etienne,de Tournai,1128-1203,Stephanus,von Orléans,1128-1203,Stephanus,Sancti Evurtii,1128-1203,Stephanus,Aurelianensis,1128-1203,Stephanus,Sanctae Genovefae,1128-1203,Stephanus,Parisiensis,1128-1203,Stephan,von Tournai,1128-1203,Stephan,von Sainte-Geneviève,1128-1203,Étienne,de Orléans,1128-1203,Stephan,von Dornick,1128-1203,Étienne,de Saint-Euverte,1128-1203,Étienne,de Tournai,1128-1203,Stephan,von Saint-Euverte,1128-1203,Étienne,de Sainte-Geneviève,1128-1203,Stefan,van Doornik,1128-1203,Stephanus,Tornaciensis,1128-1203,Stephen,of Tournai,1128-1203,Stephan,von Orléans,1128-1203,Étienne,d'Orléans,1128-1203 , Heinrich,von Segusio,1200-1270,Susa, Enrico di,1200-1270,Henricus,a Segusio,1200-1270,Segusio, Henrici de,1200-1270,Enrico,di Susa,1200-1270,Heinrich,Hostiensis,1200-1270,Henricus,de Bartholomaeis,1200-1270,Henricus,Cardinalis,1200-1270,Bartholomaeis, Henricus de,1200-1270,Heinrich,von Susa,1200-1270,Henri,de Suze,1200-1270,Henri,d'Ostie,1200-1270,Segusia, Henricus de,1200-1270,Henricus,Ostiensis,1200-1270,Henricus,Sistaricensis,1200-1270,Henricus,de Secusia,1200-1270,Henricus,Ebredunensis,1200-1270,Henricus,de Segusa,1200-1270,Henri,de Suse,1200-1270,Henricus,Hostiensis,1200-1270,Hostiensis, Henricus,1200-1270,Segusio, Henricus,1200-1270,Bartolommei, Enrico de ́,1200-1270,Henricus,de Segusio,1200-1270,Hostiensis,1200-1270,Segusio, Henricus de,1200-1270,Henricus aus Susa,1200-1270,Dominus Hostiensis,1200-1270,Heinrich,von Segusia,1200-1270 , Reinolds, John,1549-1607,Reynolds, John,1549-1607,Rainoldus, Joannes,1549-1607,Raynolds, John,1549-1607,Rainoldus, Jo.,1549-1607,Rainoldes, John,1549-1607,Rainoldus, Johannes,1549-1607,Rainolds, John,Puritanischer Theologe,1549-1607,Reynolds, John,Puritanischer Theologe,1549-1607 , Gentili, Albericus,1552-1608,Gentile, Alberico,1552-1608,Gentilis, Albertus,1552-1608,Gentili, Alberigo,1552-1608,Gentilis, Albericus,1552-1608 |
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Réforme (histoire religieuse),Reformation |