Response to the Commentary of Levenson and Khilwati
This response focuses on a distinction between emic and etic statements, that is, descriptions from within a certain tradition and the outside scientific analysis. Although carefully listening to informants and gathering otherrelevant information, the scholar searches for universal, nonculture bound...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
1999
|
In: |
The international journal for the psychology of religion
Year: 1999, Volume: 9, Issue: 4, Pages: 259-262 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|