Resurrecting van Inwagen’s simulacrum: a defense

Peter van Inwagen’s short piece on the possibility of resurrection via simulacrum from 1978 has been regularly condemned for its overall implausibility. However, this paper argues that van Inwagen’s thesis has been unfairly criticized and remains a live and salutary option. It begins by summarizing...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steffaniak, Jordan L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2023
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 93, Issue: 3, Pages: 211-225
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Van Inwagen, Peter 1942- / Resurrection / Corpse / Simulacrum / Materialism / Criticism
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
CA Christianity
NBE Anthropology
NBQ Eschatology
Further subjects:B Simulacrum
B Resurrection
B Physicalism
B Materialism
B Van Inwagen
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1846811414
003 DE-627
005 20240129093602.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230527s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-023-09861-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846811414 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846811414 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Steffaniak, Jordan L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Resurrecting van Inwagen’s simulacrum: a defense 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Peter van Inwagen’s short piece on the possibility of resurrection via simulacrum from 1978 has been regularly condemned for its overall implausibility. However, this paper argues that van Inwagen’s thesis has been unfairly criticized and remains a live and salutary option. It begins by summarizing the metaphysics of the simulacrum theory of the resurrection alongside the motivation for such a theory. Next, it challenges the four main criticisms against the van Inwagen styled simulacrum model. First, it argues that while van Inwagen’s model may appear unnecessary or irrelevant for those that reject his metaphysics of human persons, an account like his is necessary for those that desire to maintain the traditional metaphysics of resurrection (e.g., the resurrection of the “self-same” body). Second, it argues that his model does not implicate God in mass deception or irreverence for the dead. Third, it rejects the idea that van Inwagen’s model is analogous to the implausibility of young earth creationism and its required claims like dinosaur bones being given the appearance of age. Fourth, it argues that his model is not metaphysically impossible for scenarios where someone is simultaneously killed and destroyed, such as in nuclear blasts. 
601 |a Resurrection 
650 4 |a Physicalism 
650 4 |a Materialism 
650 4 |a Simulacrum 
650 4 |a Van Inwagen 
650 4 |a Resurrection 
652 |a AB:CA:NBE:NBQ 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)13344516X  |0 (DE-627)546063284  |0 (DE-576)161541577  |2 gnd  |a Van Inwagen, Peter  |d 1942- 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4003509-8  |0 (DE-627)106389297  |0 (DE-576)208851925  |2 gnd  |a Auferstehung 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4167214-8  |0 (DE-627)104492864  |0 (DE-576)209907118  |2 gnd  |a Leiche 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)7752769-0  |0 (DE-627)700620966  |0 (DE-576)347532691  |2 gnd  |a Simulakrum 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4127749-1  |0 (DE-627)105722413  |0 (DE-576)209596228  |2 gnd  |a Materialismus 
689 0 5 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4033229-9  |0 (DE-627)104137800  |0 (DE-576)209000694  |2 gnd  |a Kritik 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 93(2023), 3, Seite 211-225  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:93  |g year:2023  |g number:3  |g pages:211-225 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-023-09861-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4326539674 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846811414 
LOK |0 005 20240129093602 
LOK |0 008 230527||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-05-26#8623BA47E72C5D256D0F67E52114F6F461CB6422 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043741  |a CA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052449  |a NBQ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Corpse,Dead body,Criticism,Criticism,Materialism,Resurrection,Resurrection,Resurrection in art,Simulacrum 
STB 0 0 |a Cadavre,Critique,Critique,Matérialisme,Résurrection,Résurrection,Simulacre 
STC 0 0 |a Cadáver,Cuerpo,Cuerpo,Crítica,Crítica,Materialismo,Resurrección,Resurrección 
STD 0 0 |a Cadavere,Critica,Critica,Materialismo,Resurrezione,Resurrezione,Simulacro 
STE 0 0 |a 唯物主义,唯物论,复活,复活,尸体,尸身,死尸,批评,批判,评论 
STF 0 0 |a 唯物主義,唯物論,尸體,尸身,死尸,復活,復活,批評,批判,評論,擬像 
STG 0 0 |a Cadáver,Corpo,Corpo,Crítica,Crítica,Materialismo,Ressurreição,Ressurreição,Simulacro 
STH 0 0 |a Воскресение (мотив),Воскресение,Критика (мотив),Критика,Материализм,Мертвец,Труп,Симулякр 
STI 0 0 |a Ανάσταση (μοτίβο),Ανάσταση,Κριτική (μοτίβο),Κριτική,Πτώμα,Υλισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Inwagen, Peter van,1942-,VanInwagen, Peter,1942-,Van Inwagen, Peter Jan,1942-,Inwagen, Peter Jan van,1942-,Inwangen, Peter van,1942- , Auferstehung der Toten,Auferweckung,Totenauferweckung,Totenerweckung,Toter , Leichnam , Simulacrum