Is Interreligious Dialogue in International Relations “Dialogue-Washing” for Authoritarian Regimes? an Exploration of KAICIID and ICCS as Track 1.5 Diplomacy

This paper explores whether interreligious dialogue (IRD) is employed by state actors that may be perceived as authoritarian as a form of window dressing, or dialogue washing. Two examples are chosen, the King Abdullah International Centre for Intercultural and Interreligious Dialogue (KAICIID), and...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hedges, Paul 1970- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2023
In: The review of faith & international affairs
Year: 2023, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 67-82
Further subjects:B dialogue washing
B International Relations
B Singapore
B KAICIID
B ICCS
B Politics
B Interreligious Dialogue
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1846248221
003 DE-627
005 20230526230841.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230526s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15570274.2023.2200276  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1846248221 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1846248221 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)122599640  |0 (DE-627)08204130X  |0 (DE-576)293343365  |4 aut  |a Hedges, Paul  |d 1970- 
109 |a Hedges, Paul 1970-  |a Hedges, Paul Michael 1970- 
245 1 0 |a Is Interreligious Dialogue in International Relations “Dialogue-Washing” for Authoritarian Regimes? an Exploration of KAICIID and ICCS as Track 1.5 Diplomacy 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper explores whether interreligious dialogue (IRD) is employed by state actors that may be perceived as authoritarian as a form of window dressing, or dialogue washing. Two examples are chosen, the King Abdullah International Centre for Intercultural and Interreligious Dialogue (KAICIID), and Singapore’s International Conference on Cohesive Societies (ICCS). It is argued that such examples exemplify IRD as track 1.5 diplomacy, and the context means they veer towards performing dialogue as social cohesion. While criticisms of each are raised, it is argued that the accusation of dialogue-washing is unfounded and that useful IRD, social cohesion, or peacebuilding work emerges from each which accords with the interests of the countries involved and aligns with the nature of IRD under track 1.5 diplomacy. 
650 4 |a International Relations 
650 4 |a Politics 
650 4 |a dialogue washing 
650 4 |a KAICIID 
650 4 |a ICCS 
650 4 |a Singapore 
650 4 |a Interreligious Dialogue 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The review of faith & international affairs  |d Arlington, Va. : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005  |g 21(2023), 2, Seite 67-82  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)662163788  |w (DE-600)2612695-3  |w (DE-576)346017173  |x 1931-7743  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g pages:67-82 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2023.2200276  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4325382372 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1846248221 
LOK |0 005 20230526055509 
LOK |0 008 230526||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-05-25#9AB448A7A359AF6DD5D9B7520CBC6FD15CC14D9E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 

Similar Items

more