“Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism”
The common consent argument claims that widespread belief in God is good evidence for God’s existence. Though taken seriously throughout the history of philosophy, the argument died in the 1800s. Our philosophy of religion textbooks ignore it. In this paper, we hope to resuscitate it drawing upon th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2023
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2023, Volume: 93, Issue: 3, Pages: 189-210 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Faith
/ Supreme Being
/ Consensus
/ Existence of God
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Cognition theory
/ Theism
/ Naturalism (Philosophy)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy AE Psychology of religion NBC Doctrine of God VB Hermeneutics; Philosophy |
| Further subjects: | B
Religious Agreement
B Theism B Common Consent Argument B Consensus Gentium B cognitive science of religion B Naturalism |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1845269209 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240125181312.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230512s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-022-09856-9 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1845269209 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1845269209 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Braddock, Matthew |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a “Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism” |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The common consent argument claims that widespread belief in God is good evidence for God’s existence. Though taken seriously throughout the history of philosophy, the argument died in the 1800s. Our philosophy of religion textbooks ignore it. In this paper, we hope to resuscitate it drawing upon the demographics of religious belief, the cognitive science of religion, and contemporary epistemology. We develop and defend two common consent arguments, which maintain that widespread belief in a High God is good evidence for theism over metaphysical naturalism. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a cognitive science of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Naturalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Agreement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consensus Gentium | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Common Consent Argument | |
| 652 | |a AA:AB:AD:AE:NBC:VB | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4071867-0 |0 (DE-627)104707917 |0 (DE-576)209185139 |2 gnd |a Glaube |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4260584-2 |0 (DE-627)104633549 |0 (DE-576)210590629 |2 gnd |a Höchstes Wesen |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4010504-0 |0 (DE-627)106357514 |0 (DE-576)208888438 |2 gnd |a Konsens |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4131943-6 |0 (DE-627)10415165X |0 (DE-576)209631457 |2 gnd |a Gottesfrage |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1153645505 |0 (DE-627)1015151884 |0 (DE-576)500375216 |2 gnd |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4070914-0 |0 (DE-627)106099086 |0 (DE-576)209182261 |2 gnd |a Erkenntnistheorie |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4059729-5 |0 (DE-627)10614250X |0 (DE-576)209131942 |2 gnd |a Theismus |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4171303-5 |0 (DE-627)105395846 |0 (DE-576)209936037 |2 gnd |a Naturalismus |g Philosophie |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 93(2023), 3, Seite 189-210 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:93 |g year:2023 |g number:3 |g pages:189-210 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/BRARTC-7.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-022-09856-9 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 93 |j 2023 |e 3 |h 189-210 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4321033446 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1845269209 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240125160409 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-05-11#41468132BB6EFE1268EA50AD6EB34CF431C9DBEB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043024 |a AE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205381X |a VB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a TA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Cognition theory,Epistemology,Theory of knowledge,Knowledge,Consensus,Existence of God,God,God question,Faith,Faith,Belief in God,Supreme Being,High God,God,Theism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Consensus,Foi,Foi,Question de l’existence de Dieu,Théisme,Théorie de la connaissance,Épistémologie,Être suprême |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Consenso,Cuestión de la existencia de Dios,Epistemología,Fe,Fe,Ser supremo,Teísmo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Consenso,Epistemologia,Teoria epistemiologica,Teoria epistemiologica,Essere supremo,Fede,Fede,Questione dell'esistenza di Dio,Teismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,同意,允许,最高存有,至高存有,有神论,知识论,认识论,神存在的提问,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提问 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 信念,信念,信心,信德,信心,信德,同意,允許,最高存有,至高存有,有神論,知識論,認識論,神存在的提問,上帝的存在性,上帝存在的提問 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Consenso,Epistemologia,Fé,Fé,Questão da existência de Deus,Ser supremo,Teísmo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Вера (мотив),Вера,Вопрос о существовании Бога,Высшее существо,Консенсус,Теизм,Теория познания |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Γνωσιολογία,Γνωσιοθεωρία,Επιστημολογία,Ερώτημα της ύπαρξης του Θεού,Θεϊσμός,Πίστη (μοτίβο),Πίστη,Συναίνεση,Υπέρτατο Ον |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Glauben,Gottesglaube,Überzeugung , Hochgott,Höchster Gott , Consensus , Existenz Gottes , Cognitive science of religion , Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie,Epistemologie,Epistologie,Erkenntnislehre,Erkenntnisphilosophie,Gnoseologie |