Political Theology in Iran: Critiques of the Guardianship of Jurist in Light of Reformist Iranian Scholarship

This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Akbar, Ali (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Pubblicazione: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
In: Political theology
Anno: 2023, Volume: 24, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 302-320
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Humainī, Ruḥallāh M. 1902-1989 / Iran / Revolution / Political theology / Political theory / Wilāyat al-faqīh
Notazioni IxTheo:AD Sociologia delle religioni
BJ Islam
KBL Medio Oriente
NCD Etica politica
TK Età contemporanea
ZC Politica generale
Altre parole chiave:B Khomeini
B Iran
B Guardianship of the Jurist
B reformist scholars
B Islamic Government
B Democracy
B Political Theology
Accesso online: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Muhammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari, Mohsen Kadivar and Ahmad Qabel, unpacks these thinkers’ views concerning the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh. It is argued that these scholars’ criticisms of the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh are based not only on their interpretations of the Qurʾān and Shiʿa sources, but also philosophical arguments in which notions drawn from the field of hermeneutics are employed. It is also argued that, in challenging the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, these scholars question the view that the fuqahā have the exclusive right to rule the country, thereby presenting alternative political theories which criticize efforts to politicize religion.
ISSN:1743-1719
Comprende:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.2022069