Political Theology in Iran: Critiques of the Guardianship of Jurist in Light of Reformist Iranian Scholarship

This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Akbar, Ali (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group 2023
En: Political theology
Año: 2023, Volumen: 24, Número: 3, Páginas: 302-320
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar:B Ḫumainī, Rūḥallāh Mūsawī 1902-1989 / Iran / Irán / Revolución / Teología política / Teoría política / Wilayat-i faqīh
Clasificaciones IxTheo:AD Sociología de la religión
BJ Islam
KBL Oriente Medio
NCD Ética política
TK Período contemporáneo
ZC Política general
Otras palabras clave:B Khomeini
B Iran
B Guardianship of the Jurist
B reformist scholars
B Islamic Government
B Democracy
B Political Theology
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Descripción
Sumario:This article examines a specific line of thinking shared by several contemporary Iranian reformist scholars which emerged partly in response to the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, a political-theological theory instigated by Ayatollah Khomeini. Focusing on the ideas of reformist Iranian scholars, such as Abdolkarim Soroush, Muhammad Mujtahed Shabestari, Hasan Yousefi Eshkevari, Mohsen Kadivar and Ahmad Qabel, unpacks these thinkers’ views concerning the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh. It is argued that these scholars’ criticisms of the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh are based not only on their interpretations of the Qurʾān and Shiʿa sources, but also philosophical arguments in which notions drawn from the field of hermeneutics are employed. It is also argued that, in challenging the doctrine of velāyat-e faqīh, these scholars question the view that the fuqahā have the exclusive right to rule the country, thereby presenting alternative political theories which criticize efforts to politicize religion.
ISSN:1743-1719
Obras secundarias:Enthalten in: Political theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/1462317X.2021.2022069