Christian Ethics, Religious Ethics, and Secular Ethics: A Contemporary Reappraisal
In this essay, I argue that Christian ethicists should not think of themselves as religious ethicists. I defend this claim by arguing that the concept of religious ethics, as it has come to be understood as a discipline that is distinct from secular ethics, is incoherent. In part one, I describe the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2023
|
| In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2023, Volume: 51, Issue: 1, Pages: 11-31 |
| Further subjects: | B
Secular ethics
B Natural Law B Religious Ethics B theories of religion B Kant |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1843680335 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230502161400.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230427s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12422 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1843680335 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1843680335 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1152295179 |0 (DE-627)1013844351 |0 (DE-576)499804996 |4 aut |a Clem, Stewart |d ca. 20./21. Jh. | |
| 109 | |a Clem, Stewart ca. 20./21. Jh. |a Clem, Stewart D. ca. 20./21. Jh. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Christian Ethics, Religious Ethics, and Secular Ethics: A Contemporary Reappraisal |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this essay, I argue that Christian ethicists should not think of themselves as religious ethicists. I defend this claim by arguing that the concept of religious ethics, as it has come to be understood as a discipline that is distinct from secular ethics, is incoherent. In part one, I describe the fraught attempts by theologians in the 20th century to identify the distinctiveness of Christian ethics. In part two, I argue that certain accounts of natural law unwittingly reinforce a problematic conception of secular ethics. Part three examines some trends in religious studies and comparative religious ethics to highlight problematic conceptions of religion. Drawing together these strands of inquiry, I contend that that the secular-religious dichotomy in contemporary ethics should be rejected, but by the same token, I suggest that comparative ethics remains a worthwhile enterprise. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a theories of religion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Natural Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secular ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1973 |g 51(2023), 1, Seite 11-31 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320450171 |w (DE-600)2005952-8 |w (DE-576)090888812 |x 1467-9795 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:51 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g pages:11-31 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12422 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jore.12422 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4315065994 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1843680335 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230502161400 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230427||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2023-04-26#16FDB27F03F46CEE2F56A446A57E56114ACF0CE2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REF | |a Religionstheorie | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||