The Division of Normativity and a Defence of Demanding Moral Theories

Morality, according to some theories, demands a lot of us. One way to defend such demanding moral theories is through an appeal to the division of normativity; on this picture, morality is only one of the normative domains that guides us, so it should be expected that we often fail to follow that gu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ventham, Elizabeth (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2023
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2023, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-17
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1843544954
003 DE-627
005 20230425161730.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230425s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-022-10320-w  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1843544954 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1843544954 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ventham, Elizabeth  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Division of Normativity and a Defence of Demanding Moral Theories 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Morality, according to some theories, demands a lot of us. One way to defend such demanding moral theories is through an appeal to the division of normativity; on this picture, morality is only one of the normative domains that guides us, so it should be expected that we often fail to follow that guidance. This paper defends the division of normativity as a response to demandingness objections against an alternative: moral rationalism. It does this by addressing and refuting three arguments: the argument from blameworthiness, the argument from agency, and the argument from authority. In turn, I show that none of these arguments work as responses to the division of normativity - if normativity generally is divided, so too must be blameworthiness, agency, and authority. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 26(2023), 1, Seite 3-17  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:3-17 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-022-10320-w.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10320-w  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2023  |e 1  |h 3-17 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4314289740 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1843544954 
LOK |0 005 20230425155807 
LOK |0 008 230425||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw