Theories of Diffusionism: Myth and/or Science?

In the nineteenth century, the paradigm of the age was cultural evolutionism represented by Friedrich Max Müller, Edward B. Tylor, and James G. Frazer. With the realization of the limits of this theory in the early part of the twentieth century, there arose the new paradigm of diffusionism, represen...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matsumura, Kazuo (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: IACM, c/o Department of South Asian Studies, Harvard University 2019
In: Comparative mythology
Year: 2019, Volume: 5, Pages: 44-54
Further subjects:B Mythology
B cultural diffusionism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1841829307
003 DE-627
005 20230406090449.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230406s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1841829307 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1841829307 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Matsumura, Kazuo  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Theories of Diffusionism: Myth and/or Science? 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the nineteenth century, the paradigm of the age was cultural evolutionism represented by Friedrich Max Müller, Edward B. Tylor, and James G. Frazer. With the realization of the limits of this theory in the early part of the twentieth century, there arose the new paradigm of diffusionism, represented by George Elliot Smith and William James Perry in Great Britain, and by Father Peter Schmidt and Father Wilhelm Koppers in Austria-Germany. Curiously, this paradigm was not popular in other countries such as France and the United States and besides, the diffusionists in the two areas were not in league but showed open hostility to each other. The paper examines the diffusion theory of W. J. Perry as the representative example, and also discusses the reasons why the theory that once in vogue came to be criticized and disappeared. Today, however, diffusionism has proved to be correct thanks to the development of various branches of sciences. In a word, the early diffusionists were overzealous in presenting a universalistic theory before they could secure a firmer ground by amassing reliable data. They consequently constructed a quasi-science myth. The line that separates myth and science is not firm as this case of diffusion theory attests. 
601 |a Diffusion 
650 4 |a cultural diffusionism 
650 4 |a Mythology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Comparative mythology  |d Cambridge MA : IACM, c/o Department of South Asian Studies, Harvard University, 2015  |g 5(2019), Seite 44-54  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)846465957  |w (DE-600)2844973-3  |w (DE-576)45465300X  |x 2409-9899  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:5  |g year:2019  |g pages:44-54 
856 4 0 |u https://web.archive.org/web/20220205134649/https://www.compmyth.org/journal/index.php/cm/issue/view/2  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 5  |j 2019  |h 44-54 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4303503398 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1841829307 
LOK |0 005 20230406090449 
LOK |0 008 230406||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL