Epicurean Priority-setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond

The aim of this article is to study the relationship between Epicureanism and pandemic priority-setting and to explore whether Epicurus's philosophy is compliant with the later developed utilitarianism. We find this aim interesting because Epicurus had a different way of valuing death than our...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Hol, Bjørn (Author) ; Solberg, Carl Tollef 1988- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Linköping Univ. Electronic Press 2023
In: De Ethica
Year: 2023, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 63-83
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1841170496
003 DE-627
005 20230404120352.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230404s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.237263  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1841170496 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1841170496 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hol, Bjørn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Epicurean Priority-setting During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The aim of this article is to study the relationship between Epicureanism and pandemic priority-setting and to explore whether Epicurus's philosophy is compliant with the later developed utilitarianism. We find this aim interesting because Epicurus had a different way of valuing death than our modern society does: Epicureanism holds that death—understood as the incident of death—cannot be bad (or good) for those who die (self-regarding effects). However, this account is still consistent with the view that a particular death can be bad for everyone else but those who die, such as family, friends, and society (other-regarding effects). During the pandemic, the focus has been on the number of deaths more than on the suffering and reduced well-being of those infected and the rest of society. However, since the pandemic requires prioritization, it is, on a utilitarian account, important to consider priorities that do the most good overall. In this article, we approach the harm of death from an Epicurean point of view, seeking to flesh out potential implications for pandemic priority-setting, and healthcare in general, using a case study of COVID-19 priority-setting. We also explore whether this would conflict with utilitarianism. We conclude that an Epicurean pandemic priority-setting approach would be different but, surprisingly, not radically different from many of the actual priority-setting decisions we saw under the COVID-19 pandemic. 
601 |a COVID-19 
700 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1182270247  |0 (DE-627)1662612877  |4 aut  |a Solberg, Carl Tollef  |d 1988- 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t De Ethica  |d Linköping : Linköping Univ. Electronic Press, 2014  |g 7(2023), 2, Seite 63-83  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)797383123  |w (DE-600)2785670-7  |w (DE-576)414831071  |x 2001-8819  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:7  |g year:2023  |g number:2  |g pages:63-83 
856 |u https://de-ethica.com/article/download/4403/3867  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://de-ethica.com/article/view/4403  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3384/de-ethica.2001-8819.237263  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4301624368 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1841170496 
LOK |0 005 20230404120226 
LOK |0 008 230404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw